Olá, Visitante. Por favor entre ou registe-se se ainda não for membro.

Entrar com nome de utilizador, password e duração da sessão
 

Votação

Quem ganha?

Trump
3 (27.3%)
Biden
4 (36.4%)
Biden e Trump não aceita
4 (36.4%)
Canceladas
0 (0%)
Outra situação
0 (0%)

Votos totais: 11

Votação encerrada: 2020-11-01 13:56:52

Autor Tópico: Biden vs Trump  (Lida 17000 vezes)

Reg

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13525
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #460 em: 2024-04-03 23:51:08 »
comunistas pensam bastante no capital


quando convertidos   ao liberalismo  vao menos vezes a falencia que o bloco central

« Última modificação: 2024-04-04 00:15:52 por Reg »
Democracia Socialista Democrata. igualdade de quem berra mais O que é meu é meu o que é teu é nosso

Reg

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13525
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #461 em: 2024-04-04 00:13:23 »
ps so muda de sitio!


para nacional socialismo!


ou socialismo patriota!


ou socialismo estatal!


quem pensa ps vai acabar....   so muda de sitio
« Última modificação: 2024-04-04 00:16:44 por Reg »
Democracia Socialista Democrata. igualdade de quem berra mais O que é meu é meu o que é teu é nosso

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5924
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #462 em: 2024-04-04 01:58:54 »
ps so muda de sitio!


para nacional socialismo!


ou socialismo patriota!


ou socialismo estatal!


quem pensa ps vai acabar....   so muda de sitio


Pois, deve ser consoante as modas q vão vigendo...   :-\
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

vbm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13829
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #463 em: 2024-04-04 08:16:24 »
pc+il é novo centro
produtivista, liberal
e social q.b.,
imagino;

e não o
igualará
a IA.

Reg

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13525
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #464 em: 2024-04-04 12:49:41 »
  nao fazem liberais por decreto


  isto demora ! bocado



  chega foi feito as 3 pancadas ...  basicamente


liberalismo feito 3 pancadas e socialismo na mesma
« Última modificação: 2024-04-04 15:26:26 por Reg »
Democracia Socialista Democrata. igualdade de quem berra mais O que é meu é meu o que é teu é nosso

vbm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13829
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #465 em: 2024-04-04 16:18:13 »
ps & ch
não prestam.

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5924
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #466 em: 2024-04-04 20:31:34 »
ps & ch
não prestam.


Pois... é tudo socialismo...   :(
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

Reg

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13525
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #467 em: 2024-04-04 20:58:49 »
o imperio socialista!



“O futebol é mais instrumentalizado hoje do que foi durante o Estado Novo”
Quando o FC Porto é campeão nacional, vai à Câmara do Porto [desde que Rui Rio tomou posse, essa tradição mudou]. E o Benfica à Câmara de Lisboa. Até tenho ideia de que o futebol é hoje mais instrumentalizado, também de uma forma espontânea, do que no período do Estado Novo. Basta ver o Euro 2004 e a aposta do Estado no futebol, para o potenciar e para retirar dividendos com a sua promoção. O Estado Novo nunca apostou no futebol, antes pelo contrário.


socialismo aposta bola

em bispos catolicos.....


etc....



sera socialismo ja se esqueceu o que era estado portugues!  tipo pais a serio!



   estado 25 abril ainda fez futeboll  mais tribalismo que antes!

  e obra!


estado mete nariz.... e coisa ainda fica mais tribalista!




     agora querem por la padres!  jesuitas no meio disto


fazer igreja mais tribalista!




ate parece   socialismo fazem proposito para dividir e reinar!
« Última modificação: 2024-04-04 21:18:02 por Reg »
Democracia Socialista Democrata. igualdade de quem berra mais O que é meu é meu o que é teu é nosso

Reg

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13525
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #468 em: 2024-04-04 21:20:54 »
“O futebol é mais instrumentalizado hoje do que foi durante o Estado Novo”
Sim. Com todo o respeito pelo Eusébio, que foi um dos melhores jogadores de sempre, nunca encontrei nenhum indício que leve a pensar que Eusébio tenha sido “nacionalizado” ou impedido de sair do Benfica por ser um símbolo ou herói nacional. O que aconteceu, e o próprio Eusébio o diz numa entrevista em 1995, foi que em 1962-63, ele teve um pré-acordo com a Juventus e acabou por não sair por intervenção do Estado Novo, mas porque tinha de ir para tropa


. À luz do Estado Novo, era impensável dispensar fosse quem fosse de ir à tropa


“O futebol é mais instrumentalizado hoje do que foi durante o Estado Novo”
o Inter de Milão quis contratar Eusébio, que chegou mesmo a escolher casa, e só não foi porque a federação italiana fechou as portas a estrangeiros, por causa de ter feito um mau Mundial e de querer potenciar os jogadores nacionais. A


“O futebol é mais instrumentalizado hoje do que foi durante o Estado Novo”
E teve mesmo um presidente comunista…“O futebol é mais instrumentalizado hoje do que foi durante o Estado Novo”
Sim, o que é inédito. Manuel da Conceição Afonso é o único caso conhecido de um comunista a presidir a um clube durante o Estado Novo. Naquela altura, todos os dirigentes de instituições tinham de assinar uma declaração a dizer que não eram comunistas.




« Última modificação: 2024-04-04 21:26:46 por Reg »
Democracia Socialista Democrata. igualdade de quem berra mais O que é meu é meu o que é teu é nosso

Reg

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13525
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #469 em: 2024-04-04 21:29:17 »
se socialismo mete nariz na bola hoje em dia

e bola e mais tribalista


o que axam socialismo meter nariz na igreja....


igreja mais tribalista!
« Última modificação: 2024-04-04 21:30:07 por Reg »
Democracia Socialista Democrata. igualdade de quem berra mais O que é meu é meu o que é teu é nosso

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5924
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #470 em: 2024-04-04 22:20:23 »
se socialismo mete nariz na bola hoje em dia

e bola e mais tribalista


o que axam socialismo meter nariz na igreja....


igreja mais tribalista!


Pois eu não aprecio - nem socialismo nem football...    ::)    Igrejas, normalmente, aprecio-as pelas suas qualidades artísticas!   :D
« Última modificação: 2024-04-04 22:20:52 por Kaspov »
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5924
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #471 em: 2024-04-17 03:34:36 »
As possibilidades do D. Trump ser eleito em Novembro continuam em alta:

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-vs-biden-vs-kennedy-vs-west-vs-stein

(tb são interessantes os 9,3 % do RFK)
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5924
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #472 em: 2024-05-30 03:33:41 »
Interesting!    :D


«"A Pervasive Fear Has Settled In": Dems Are Absolutely Freaking Out Over Biden

Tyler Durden's Photo

by Tyler Durden

Tuesday, May 28, 2024 - 05:45 PM


While keeping in mind the old adage "It's not the votes that count, but who counts the votes," Democrats are absolutely freaking out about what a dumpster fire Joe Biden is heading into the 2024 election.
Susan Walsh/AP

According to Politico, "A pervasive sense of fear has settled in at the highest levels of the Democratic Party over President Joe Biden’s reelection prospects, even among officeholders and strategists who had previously expressed confidence about the coming battle with Donald Trump."

And while Democrats have spent 2024 on a "joyless and exhausting grind," now, nearly five months away from the election, "anxiety has morphed into palpable trepidation," according to more than a dozen party leaders and operatives who spoke with the outlet.

"You don’t want to be that guy who is on the record saying we’re doomed, or the campaign’s bad or Biden’s making mistakes. Nobody wants to be that guy," said one Democratic operative close to the White House, adding that Biden's terrible polling "are creating the freakout."

"This isn’t, ‘Oh my God, Mitt Romney might become president.’ It’s ‘Oh my God, the democracy might end.’" the source added, dramatically.

The freakout comes as Trump leads in 5 key states, while young and nonwhite voters are shifting allegiances:

Strategists catching the vapors

And while the White House isn't yet facing reality, Democratic strategists are telling it like it is...

    But Democratic critics of the campaign’s approach — while agreeing that abortion should be a winning issue — said they’re challenged when pressed by friends to make the case for why Biden will win.

    “There’s still a path to win this, but they don’t look like a campaign that’s embarking on that path right now,” said Pete Giangreco, a longtime Democratic strategist who’s worked on multiple presidential campaigns. “If the frame of this race is, ‘What was better, the 3.5 years under Biden or four years under Trump,’ we lose that every day of the week and twice on Sunday.” -Politico

And then we have this suspected offworlder, former Clinton strategist James Carville, who says Democrat messaging is full of shit:

Pollster Nate Silver, who was more or less unpersoned by the Democrats for getting 2016 wrong and has since become moderately redpilled, shreds Democrat messaging that the economy is ackshually doing great, and people complaining about inflation are out of touch.

Silver's FiveThirtyEight has Biden's average job rating at 38.4%, vs. 38.1% on March 7 - suggesting that whatever the Biden campaign has been attempting isn't working...

    Whatever the Biden campaign has been doing over the past two months — and it’s a lot of activity, including $25 million in swing-state ad spending, according to AdImpact — it has had only a limited effect. According to FiveThirtyEight, Biden’s average job-approval rating on March 7, the date of his State of the Union Address, was 38.1 percent. As of Friday, it’s 38.4 percent. -Politico

Politico then notes that Trump has been eating away at Biden's lead in 'safe' blue states, conducting what they called "psychological warfare" in New York, California and New Jersey (dramatic!).

 

    Trump, meanwhile, has already started his incursion into safe blue states. His campaign’s psychological warfare in New York, California and New Jersey — where House districts will determine control of Congress’ lower chamber — is spiking Democrats’ already-elevated blood pressure.

    “New York Democrats need to wake up,” said Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine. “The number of people in New York, including people of color that I come across who are saying positive things about Trump, is alarming.”

 

Meanwhile, Trump is crushing Biden when it comes to fundraising - having raised $25 million last month, not including a record-setting $50.5 million haul from an event in Palm Beach, Florida.

"The list of why we ‘could’ win is so small I don’t even need to keep the list on my phone," one Democratic adviser told the outlet.

And of course, the Biden campaign is playing dumb (or they're just dumb. We'll go with that.):

"Trump’s photo-ops and PR stunts may get under the skin of some very serious D.C. people as compelling campaigning, but they will do nothing to win over the voters that will decide this election," said campaign spokesman Kevin Munoz. "The work we do every day on the ground and on the airwaves in our battleground states — to talk about how President Biden is fighting for the middle class against the corporate greed that’s keeping prices high, and highlight Donald Trump’s anti-American campaign for revenge and retribution and abortion bans — is the work that will again secure us the White House."

Keep telling yourself that, Kevin.»


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/pervasive-fear-has-settled-dems-are-absolutely-freaking-out-over-biden
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5924
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #473 em: 2024-05-30 19:52:05 »
«Dozens Attend Divisive Biden "Black Outreach" Event In Philadelphia

Tyler Durden's Photo

by Tyler Durden

Thursday, May 30, 2024 - 05:25 PM


President Joe Biden and VP Kamala Harris were in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on Wednesday, where they struggled to fill a college gymnasium with supporters for a the media called a "black voter outreach" event amid the Biden campaign's struggle to keep black voters in his electoral coalition.
President Joe Biden (L) and Vice President Kamala Harris (R) take the stage at a campaign rally at Girard College in Philadelphia, on May 29, 2024. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

The pair launched a new campaign effort, "Black Voters for Biden-Harris," during a visit to Girard College - a boarding school primarily made up of black students. As part of the new drive, the campaign will partner with black organizations in an attempt to increase outreach among voters in key states, while also collaborating with groups on voter education and registration activation, both online and on the ground.

According to the Epoch Times, the campaign will also utilize partner organizations’ networks to “strengthen our voter protection efforts to safeguard the Black vote from continued MAGA attacks,” according to the press release.

The Biden-Harris campaign plans to hold multiple events in battleground states, including black church engagement in Arizona, new office openings throughout Georgia, and a community-led block party-style celebration in Nevada, campaign officials said.

Further organizing events will also take place throughout the weekend in Florida, Maine, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

As the Conservative Treehouse notes, the event was "one of the most divisive, toxic and bitter racist events in modern political history."

    The Biden campaign is relying on the formula they used in 2020, where James Clyburn, Barack Obama, the AME Church and Black Lives Matter organizers activated a regional playbook to influence the election.

    In the big picture the Black Lives Matter (BLM) group are the ballot harvesters, the essential foot soldiers for the race-based electoral system Clyburn and Obama constructed. The AME network are the ballot counters, the precinct poll workers, spread throughout the various urban enclaves of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona, Virgina and both Carolinas. It’s a race-based coalition, dependent on conformity to achieve the 2024 objective.

    The extremely toxic remarks made by Joe Biden were intended to rally the racist sentiment amid the black voters in the key precincts within key states.  However, for 2024 the challenge is larger. Minorities are just like all Americans who are negatively impacted by Bidenomics, inflation, energy prices, the open border and illegal migration ¹intended to suppress wages.

Watch:

The event comes as Biden's support continues to slip among black voters. More via the Epoch Times;
The president used his appearance in Philadelphia to criticize his rival, former President Donald Trump, whose recent South Bronx campaign stop drew thousands of supporters in one of the most Democrat-leaning counties in the nation.

President Biden also used the opportunity to tout his successes during his time in office, including appointing the first black woman to the United States Supreme Court, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, and appointing more black women to the federal circuit courts than“every other president in American history combined.”
His visit came as recent polling showed support for the president among black adults—one of his most loyal constituencies in 2020—has declined dramatically while President Trump appears to be gaining support among African Americans, in particular men.

President Biden’s overall approval rating among black Americans has decreased from 87 percent in March 2021 to 55 percent in April 2023, according to Pew Research.
“Because Black Americans voted, Kamala and I are President and Vice President of the United States — because of you,” President Biden said at Girard College.

“That’s not hyperbole,” he continued. “Because you voted, Donald Trump is a defeated former president and with your vote in 2024, we’re going to make Donald Trump a loser again.”

Oh?»


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/dozens-attend-divisive-biden-black-outreach-event-philadelphia
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5924
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #474 em: 2024-05-31 19:52:22 »
«"I Just Donated $300k To Trump"

Tyler Durden's Photo

by Tyler Durden

Friday, May 31, 2024 - 01:10 PM


Authored by Shaun Maguire via X


I just donated $300k to Trump. I’m prepared to lose friends. Here’s why.

Back in 2016 I had drunk the media Kool-Aid and was scared out of my mind about Trump. As such I donated to Hilary Clinton’s campaign and voted for her.

By 2020 I was disillusioned and didn’t vote – I didn’t like either option.

Now, in 2024, I believe this is one of the most important elections of my lifetime, and I’m supporting Trump.

I know that I’ll lose friends for this. Some will refuse to do business with me. The media will probably demonize me, as they have so many others before me. But despite this, I still believe it’s the right thing to do.

I refuse to live in a society where people are afraid to speak.

The 2016 Election

I’m going to start off with something provocative, but I think it leads to a different take on the most controversial Trump issue, which is obviously January 6th. So here goes nothing.

I believe the 2016 election was manipulated to hurt Hilary Clinton and to help Donald Trump.

Hilary Clinton herself believes this, she has denied the 2016 election result dozens of times, and still does to this day. Plot twist: I agree with her! Look into Guccifer 2.0 which was the “hacker group” that strategically leaked her emails (through Wikileaks) in a drip campaign at just the right moments. Turns out it was the Russian GRU. And remember all those fake news and bot farms? These incidents are the tip of the spear -- some of the publicly known incidents. There was extreme manipulation happening during the 2016 election.

Before proceeding, please watch at least 30 seconds of this video. It’s “24 straight minutes of Democrats denying election results.”

Russia (and others) interfering in the 2016 election was nothing new, this happens in every election, everywhere in the world. Obviously.

But for me, as someone that used to work in National Security, Russia’s implicit support for Trump made me deathly afraid of him getting elected as President.

I was wrong, and Russia miscalculated. President Trump turned out to be a master of foreign policy and particularly strong towards Russia. If you’ve never seen it before, please watch this two minute clip from Trump at a NATO breakfast 5 years ago.

If you're too lazy, Trump told Germany that they're a) owned by Russia via their energy dependence b) financing Russia's war machine by buying their energy c) not investing enough in defense, investing only 1% of GDP, which was below the 2% NATO commitment, meanwhile the US was investing 4.2% of GDP. And yet the world said he's owned by Russia?

For other Trump foreign policy wins, he: a) signed the Abraham Accords b) successfully put Iran in the penalty box, which the Biden administration immediately unwound and c) he helped India see the dangers of having their comms networks controlled by China resulting in Huawei and TikTok bans there.

My “radicalization” towards the center

August 16th, 2021 was the day I knew I could never support Joe Biden or any of the senior officials in his administration. This was the day that Afghans fell to their deaths from US C-17 airplanes at the Kabul International Airport, or KAIA as ISAF forces referred to it.

Back in 2012 I deployed to Afghanistan working for DARPA. I used to fly out of KAIA at least weekly, usually taking a Blackhawk to Bagram Airfield (BAF), but sometimes jumping on a C-130 down to Kandahar (KAF).

I'm not going to go into all of the details here, but this was personal for me -- as it was for anyone that served in Afghanistan. Most have the wrong impression of what happened there. Afghanistan wasn't Iraq. And real progress had been made. It took roughly 15 years to stabilize most of Afghanistan, but the ISAF coalition had gotten it to the place that little girls were going to school in Kabul, sometimes walked there by their mothers who weren't even wearing Burkas anymore. All of this was unimaginable a decade prior.

And then there's the strategic aspect. The US's most strategic base in Afghanistan was Bagram Airfield. Unless you've been there it's impossible to imagine how strategic this base is, and how easy it is to defend. Nestled in a remote valley at the foothills of the Himalayas. Within a couple hour flight of China and Iran, and a few minute flight to Pakistan. I believe this airfield could have been held for 50+ years with 50,000 men. A similar scale to the US permanent forces stationed at Ramstein Air Base in Germany or the US bases in Okinawa, Japan.

We gave up one of the most strategic air bases in the world, and arguably stability in Kabul, for political gain -- to be able to say that President Biden ended the War in Afghanistan. And we did it in the most incompetent manner possible, literally with people falling from our airplanes. Everyone I have spoken with that served in Afghanistan knows this.

Global instability

It wasn't just Afghanistan, I believe that the Biden administration has had some of the worst foreign policy in decades. And this has manifested in two major Wars breaking out during their administration, with Russia's invasion of Ukraine and Iran's proxy attack against Israel.

Was the timing just bad luck? I don't believe so. I believe that a weak America leads to a chaotic world.

The failed Afghanistan pull-out showed the weakness of the Biden administration. They failed to adapt to changing facts on the ground, chiefly the Afghan army putting up no resistance as the Taliban drove towards Kabul. If the US can't adapt quickly in a theater where we're already active, how can it react quickly to a blitz in a new theater, Ukraine? Granted the Russian's botched their blitz, miscalculating the weather, almost certainly to keep China happy as they hosted the Olympics in Feb 2022.

The most damaging foreign policy has been the Biden administration's approach to Iran. Biden resuscitated Obama's braindead Iran doctrine. Somehow believing that the theocratic Islamic Regime could be turned towards the West.

But it's much worse than this. After Hamas' attack against Israel on October 7th, Iran took credit for planning the attack publicly. Moreover, Iran was so bold that their proxies carried out over 300 attacks against US bases and Naval ships. Many of the attacks haven't been disclosed or publicized. At least 4 US soldiers have been killed in these attacks. And yet somehow despite this, the Biden administration has been rewarding Iran by unfreezing their funds, mourning the death of President Raisi and hamstringing Israel in its proxy battle.

This level of weakness is unprecedented in my opinion. The US has been kissing the ring of its attacker, literally while attacks against our Armed Forces are carried out. If you start looking, it's hard to see anything other than Iranian foreign influence in the Biden administration, such as what Semafor reported on, and which was effectively buried by our mainstream media.

The Biden administration has been a dream come true for foreign adversaries, and a nightmare for US allies. Trusting of enemies, and fickle with friends.

Israel

To anyone that follows me on X you know that I'm a staunch Israel supporter and also Zionist. I believe that Israel is one of America's most important allies in the world. Unfortunately, in a post-Snowden world, Israel is now arguably the world's top cyber power. And it's a critical intelligence ally for any US operations in the Middle East. It's also becoming an advanced weapons partner, co-developing the hypersonic missile defense system Arrow 3 and also Iron Dome + Iron Beam.

The Islamic Regime in Iran terrorizes its own people and their proxies terrorize the entire region. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia has been modernizing at an exceptional pace. Somehow the Biden administration has chosen to cuddle up to Iran while driving Saudi Arabia and Israel away. This is unforgivably disastrous policy in my opinion.

Double standards

The next topic that has boiled my blood are the double standards and lawfare that Trump has faced. Here are some examples:

    Classified documents: Hilary Clinton, Joe Biden, Mike Pence and Donald Trump were all caught with classified documents. Only Trump was indicted. Either it's a crime for all of them or none of them. All of the arguments about quantity of documents or obstruction are distractions to justify a double standard.

    The Border Wall: remember how Trump was villainized for promoting a border wall? Biden resumed building sections of it after pausing them, which the legacy media has been very quiet about.
    Election denialism: yes, Trump denied the 2020 election results. But as we linked to above, so did Hilary Clinton and Joe Biden regarding the 2016 results. As have hundreds of other politicians since 2000. Either they're all election deniers, or none of them.

    Corruption charges: every inch has been searched for Trump corruption while Joe Biden's involvement with foreign countries (through Hunter) have been swept under the rug. Here are some examples.

    Three strikes for thee but not for me: Joe Biden was the architect of the 1994 Crime Bill, which most attribute as the source of the mass incarceration we saw over the next two decades (especially amongst black communities). Crack cocaine in particular was treated harshly when combined with the 1986 Anti-Drug Abuse Act. Watch this video. Hunter Biden would be locked up for life if the same rules were applied to him that Joe Biden imposed on thousands of others.

This is just the tip of the double standard iceberg.

Lawfare

This is too broad of a topic to go into detail here, but suffice to say I've spent hundreds of hours following the trials and researching the charges against Trump. This has been another radicalizing experience. I understand that normally when there's smoke there's fire, but in this case I think when there's smoke there's lawfare.

To anyone with a curious mind, I implore you to go deep on any of the charges against Trump, whether civil or criminal. Here's a very quick summary of some of the fishy aspects:

    Election Interference Case: Jack Smith was appointed Special Counsel to prosecute Trump. Jack Smith previously got the Governor of Virginia convicted of corruption charges... WHICH WERE THEN UNANIMOUSLY OVERTURNED BY THE SUPREME COURT. Basically Jack Smith misled the Jury. Why would you choose Jack Smith to be the Special Counsel for this case? Maybe if all you're trying to do is to get charges to stick before an election, even if you know they'll be overturned subsequently by the Supreme Court?

    The Classified Documents Case: once again Jack Smith is the Special Counsel.
    Georgia Election Interference: The Fulton County DA, Fani Willis, has a history of corruption. It turns out that the outside lawyer she selected to prosecute Trump ... is someone she was having a romantic relationship with, Nathan Wade.Wade's Law firm made about $700k after Willis appointed him. This was concealed. Wade has since resigned from the case but Willis is still involved.

    The Hush Money Case: The key witness, Michael Cohen, is a proven liar. His testimony has been filled with contradiction after contradiction.

    Bank Fraud: Trump was ordered by Judge Engoron to pay over $350M in civil judgment that he committed bank fraud. This whole case reeked of corruption. This was an incident where no harm had been done: the banks had already been fully repaid with interest. The most important point in the case was Judge Engoron arguing that Mar-a-Lago was worth only between $18M and $27.6M when Trump had said it's worth between $426.5M and $612M. Judge Engoron tried to compare apples to oranges, with an appraised value vs market value for a property that is very clearly worth something close to Trump's range.

    Sexual Assault / E Jean Carroll: the background to this case was almost unbelievable. In simple terms, a woman in 2019, E Jean Carroll, came out and said that 20+ years prior, in the late 1990s, Donald Trump had sexually assaulted her. The statute of limitations on this case had expired more than a decade prior to her claims. But the state of New York did something unprecedented and opened a one year window where people could file claims for sexual abuse going back to exactly the window when E Jean Carroll accused him. So that's point #1, there was lawfare around the statute of limitations. Point #2 is that the case was highly irregular and ultimately the Jury determined that Trump did not rape E Jean Carroll, despite her claims. But they did determine that he sexually assaulted her (a lesser charge than rape.)

All of these cases are too complicated for most to follow, almost by design. As someone that has been following the cases closely, I've had the opposite reaction of what was intended: a) every single case seems to have had impropriety and b) after going through Trump's entire life, if these are the worst things they can find, then he did less wrong then I otherwise would have assumed.

Fairness is one of my guiding principles in life and simply, these cases haven't been fair for Trump.

Where do I disagree with Republicans?

The number one area is abortion. This is obviously a lightning rod issue. As someone with libertarian leaning views, I believe the Republicans have the wrong stance around imposing their views on others. That said, I think Democrats misunderstand the constitutional argument that this should be a states issue.

Domestic policies

Other than abortion, I believe that President Trump and the Republicans have been better on most domestic issues. Look at the quality of life in Red States such as Florida and Texas vs that in Blue States like California, Oregon and New York. I used to live in San Francisco and now live in Los Angeles. The crime and homelessness is out of control.

Trump was villainized for his stance on building a border wall, but we've had about 10M illegal immigrants cross into the US already during President Biden's tenure.

The Democrats have been trying to regulate technology -- especially open source AI and crypto in ways that incentivize the best builders to build outside of America.

25 years ago I believe the Far Right was vastly more dangerous than the Far Left. But today I believe the Far Left, and especially Antifa, is more dangerous. Our attention and maintenance was on the Far Right while we ignored the Far Left.

The 2020 election and January 6th

Now onto the elephant in the room, the 2020 election. The topic so taboo that if you talk about it you're immediately cancelled. I'm willing to wade into this fire -- some of us need to be willing to.

I believe America has conflated two issues: the 2020 election itself and January 6th.

Just as Hilary Clinton and dozens of other democrats claimed the 2016 election was stolen (which I agree with). I believe there was a similar scale, or even more interference in the 2020 election. We need to be able to talk about this, so that we can fix the problems. Democracy doesn't work without secure elections. But it also doesn't work without peaceful transitions of power. Both are essential.

I believe there was extreme election interference but I don't believe January 6th was the right response. Bear with me.

So what was going on during the 2020 election?

I held a Top Secret (TS/SCI) clearance for about 7 years and used to work in information warfare, and also cybersecurity. I've seen nation-state tactics that most can't imagine. It is from this lens, and through access to lots of non-public information, through which I viewed the election.

If you go back to the 2020 election, arguably the most sophisticated cyberattack in history was taking place. This was the SolarWinds supply chain attack. This attack was so sophisticated that it's impossible to know exactly what it was used for. And much of what we do know has never been reported.

Washington has an interesting phenomenon where when something incredibly damaging is learned, people oftentimes clam up and refuse to deal with it. I've seen this first hand multiple times now.

But we also have things like the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, which the FBI was in possession of for roughly a year before the election, and despite it being easy to verify its authenticity, the FBI was actively telling Facebook and Twitter that it is fake news and they recommended banning sharing of the NY Post article about it.

But there were so many other issues. Not least of which was a global pandemic that almost certainly leaked from a Chinese lab, but we weren't allowed to talk about that. Nor the mail-in ballot issues.

Many point to the 2020 election and say "there's no smoking gun evidence so therefore there was no interference!" My retort is that there's not public evidence and in general the DoD/IC is afraid to push too far on the issue, knowing how damaging it would be to find interference. There's things I can't say.

The end result is a 2020 election where Biden and Trump combined received 155.5M votes vs the 128.8M combined for Hilary and Trump in 2016. That's 26.7M more votes in 2020 compared to 2016. That's a 20% increase in voter turnout in a period where the population only grew by a few percent. In an election where people weren't inspired by either candidate. And where there was more voting friction than ever before due to COVID-19.

Personally I don't think it's fair for Hilary Clinton to be able to claim the 2016 election was stolen, but Donald Trump to be indicted for the same thing.

Regarding the January 6th protests. I don't agree with them. Even if an election is stolen I think the correct democratic response is to accept it, have peaceful transition of power, and then to fight like hell on the backend to make sure it never happens again.

Regarding Trump's involvement in January 6th. The clearest thing he did was deny the election results, but again, so did Hilary Clinton. So if this isn't a crime in and of itself, then what else did he do?

The rest is fuzzy. There is conflicting testimony, especially around when the National Guard was requested. On the one hand you had the testimonies of General Charles Flynn and Lt. General Walter Piatt. But on the other side you have the testimonies of Colonel Earl Mathews, Trump's Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and The Head of the Capitol Police at the time, Steven Sund. The media reports on Trump's January 6th involvement in absolute terms but again, if you go deep, it's unclear. For me, if Trump actually asked for the National Guard to be ready to go during January 6th it's a major counterpoint against the allegations that he was inciting an insurrection.

Summary

In 2016 there were two primary reasons I voted for Hilary (and was deathly afraid of Trump)

#1) Russia helped him in the election by hurting Hilary. This made me susceptible to the media narrative that he's owned by Russia and will be a foreign policy disaster.

#2) Candidly the clip where he said "I grab them by their pussy" deeply bothered me.

These two things built a pattern in my mind that Trump was out of control.

But now with the benefit of hindsight, revisiting these two points:

#1) To my shock, I believe Trump was one of the best foreign policy Presidents in decades, and during the most complex period in almost a century, as the East rises, which leads to a changing set of rules.

#2) That clip still sits in the back of my mind, but I personally consider the double standards and lawfare against Trump to be 10x worse, and 10x more dangerous for our Democracy.

What's next?

Do I agree with Trump on everything? Of course not. The area where I disagree with Republicans the most is on Women's rights. And I'm sure I'll disagree with some of Trump's policies in the future.

But in general I think he was surprisingly prescient, such as with the border wall, and he was also a masterful negotiator, such as with the Abraham accords.

There's a real chance President Trump is convicted of felony charges and sentenced to prison. Bluntly, that's part of why I'm supporting him. I believe our justice system is being weaponized against him.

If abortion is your most important issue, then I get it, vote for Biden. If any other topic is your most important issue, then do your homework and investigate the manipulation I outlined above.

Given the two choices, I believe President Trump is overwhelmingly the stronger candidate. Again, this is something I couldn't have imagined saying in 2016.

Conclusion

Speak up. Don't be silenced. Freedom of speech is worth nothing if you're afraid to use it. We can't let cancel culture win.

There's no greater country in the world than America. But America has had a bad decade. America is blessed with a robust constitution, abundant natural resources and diverse people. The way out from here is by focusing on our strengths, which are liberalism and hard work. We need to start building again.

Best of luck to President Trump.

-----

*Note that everything in this post reflects my personal views and not the views of my employer. I work in Silicon Valley which traditionally leans very far left. I'm lucky to work at a place that tolerates spirited debate and independent thinking. If the truth is in the middle, it's impossible to find it without sharing our ideas and debating each other.»


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/shaun-maguire-i-just-donated-300k-trump
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5924
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #475 em: 2024-06-03 03:42:29 »
Grandes doações!   :D


«Trump Campaign Raises Staggering $200 Million Since Thursday Conviction

Tyler Durden's Photo

by Tyler Durden

Monday, Jun 03, 2024 - 12:15 AM


If Democrats needed further confirmation that prosecuting Donald Trump on an obscure misdemeanor elevated to a felony just for him... (while the same DA reduced 60% of felonies to misdemeanors last year), the Trump campaign has raised over $200 million since Thursday's verdict in the former president's New York 'hush money' trial.

Of that, $70 million was from small donors, and 30% of the total were first-time donors to a political campaign, Eric Trump told Fox News' Maria Bartiromo on Sunday.

"I mean, these are Americans who are p*ssed off, said the younger Trump. "They're coming out of the woodwork and they want to support a guy that they just believe is getting bamboozled by a system.

"We saw it with Impeachment one, we saw it with Impeachment two, we see it where they weaponize every liberal DA and AG across the country with one intent: To take him down, to slander him, to ruin his reputation, to try and divide his family, to try and bankrupt him, to throw him in jail, to do whatever the hell they can do," he added.

"America sees through it. They know exactly what's going on."

As the Post Millennial notes further;

    The $200 million was raised in a matter of just three days, which far surpasses any amount raised by President Biden's campaign in a similar time frame. Within 24 hours of President Trump's guilty verdict, the Trump campaign received $53 million in donations. The Biden campaign raised a total of $51 million for all of April.

According to a Friday statement by Trump campaign officials Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita, "Biden and his Democrat allies have turned our legal system into a political tool, and Americans from every corner of the country have had enough," adding "This momentum is just getting started and together, as President Trump stated perfectly, Americans will render the real verdict on November 5."»


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-campaign-raises-staggering-200-million-thursday-conviction
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5924
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Biden vs Trump
« Responder #476 em: 2024-06-03 20:46:47 »
«The billionaires rallying behind Trump after his conviction

1 hour ago

Bernd Debusmann Jr,BBC News, Washington

Getty Images Donald Trump at a UFC event in New Jersey on 1 JuneGetty Images

The Trump campaign says it raised $53m within a day of his New York verdict


Ultra-wealthy Republican donors are rallying behind former US President Donald Trump following his historic trial and criminal conviction.

Mr Trump, the Republican candidate for this November's White House election, was found guilty of falsifying business records to conceal hush money paid to former adult-film star Stormy Daniels.

While he has lagged behind Joe Biden and the Democrats' fundraising efforts, the conviction injected new life into his electoral bid - with his campaign announcing that it raised nearly $53m (£41.6m) in just 24 hours after the verdict.

Israeli-American casino billionaire Miriam Adelson is expected to announce a multi-million dollar boost to Mr Trump's campaign this week.

According to US media reports, Mrs Adelson will donate to a political action committee called Preserve America. Political action committees can spend unlimited sums of money backing candidates for elected office.

While it is unclear how much she plans to spend, Politico and other US news outlets have reported that the contribution is expected to exceed the $90m donation to Preserve America by Mrs Adelson and her late husband, Sheldon, ahead of the 2020 election.

Getty Images Miriam Adelson with Donald TrumpGetty Images
Miriam Adelson (left) with Mr Trump

Others are likely to follow suit. In the hours following the verdict last week, a number of wealthy billionaires posted messages of support for Mr Trump.

Among them was Silicon Valley investor David Sacks, who posted on X, formerly Twitter, that there "is now only one issue in this election: whether the American people will stand for the USA becoming a Banana Republic".

On 6 June, Mr Sacks and fellow investor Chamath Palihapitiya, are planning to host a fundraiser for Mr Trump in San Francisco. Attendees are reportedly being asked to contribute as much as $300,000.

Another potential donor, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, is expected to make an announcement on X in the coming days about supporting Mr Trump.

While three years ago Mr Ackman said that Mr Trump "should apologise to all Americans" in the wake of the US Capitol riot, the financier has since softened his tone and offered words of support to the former president online.

Blackstone Group CEO Steve Schwarzman - one of the most prominent billionaires on Wall Street - has already announced he will support Mr Trump in the election.

Like Mr Ackman, Mr Schwarzman had previously distanced himself from the ex-president.

Getty Images Blackstone Group CEO Steve SchwarzmanGetty Images
Blackstone CEO Steve Schwarzman backs Mr Trump

But in late May, Mr Schwarzman said that he shared "the concern of most Americans that our economic, immigration and foreign policies are taking the country in the wrong direction".

He also said the "dramatic rise of antisemitism has led me to focus on the consequences of the upcoming election with greater urgency".

Other prominent billionaires who have thrown their support behind Mr Trump so far include hedge fund founders John Paulson and Robert Mercer, as well as fracking pioneer Harold Hamm and casino mogul Steve Wynn.

Billionaire investor Nelson Peltz - who said after the US Capitol riot that he regretted voting for Trump in 2020 - has had a change of heart and hosted the former president at his oceanfront Florida mansion in March.

Elon Musk, on the other hand, has previously said he will not be donating to either candidate this electoral cycle, although he does plan to host a livestreamed town-hall style event with Mr Trump.

Similarly, billionaire tech financier and prominent Republican donor Peter Thiel has reportedly turned down requests to donate to the Trump campaign and was said not to be planning any contributions this electoral cycle.

Shaun Maguire, a partner at prominent venture capital firm Sequoia, announced a $300,000 donation to Mr Trump within minutes of last week's verdict, arguing that the trial was unfair.

In a lengthy post on X, Mr Maguire outlined a number of reasons for supporting Mr Trump, including the Biden administration's handling of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan and "weakness" in the Middle East.

The various legal cases against Mr Trump, Mr Maguire added, also served as a "radicalising experience".

"There's a real chance President Trump is convicted of felony charges and sentenced to prison," he wrote. "Bluntly, that's part of why I'm supporting him. I believe our justice system is being weaponised against him."

To date, the Biden campaign has largely surpassed the Trump campaign as far as fundraising.

By the end of April, the campaign had a record $192m cash-on-hand, compared to the Trump campaign's $93.1m.

That same month, however, the Trump campaign raised $76m, surpassing their Democratic rivals for the first time in this election cycle. The Biden campaign raised $51m in April, sharply down from the $90m-plus raised a month earlier.

But despite all the fundraising, Professor Justin Buchler, a campaign finance expert from Case Western Reserve University in Ohio, told the BBC: "Money is not going to be determinative.

"The primary role of money in a campaign is to increase name recognition. Everybody already knows who Donald Trump and Joe Biden are."

A review of data from CBS, the BBC's US partner, has found that Mr Trump's fundraising tends to enjoy a boost during key moments in his various legal battles.

Before last week's conviction, his single best fundraising days were 4 April last year - the day of his arraignment in New York City - as well as 25 August, when a mugshot of him taken in Georgia was released.

The BBC has contacted the Trump and Biden campaigns for comment on the fundraising.»


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckvvlv3lewxo
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!