Olá, Visitante. Por favor entre ou registe-se se ainda não for membro.

Entrar com nome de utilizador, password e duração da sessão
 

Autor Tópico: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal  (Lida 299229 vezes)

vbm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13829
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1860 em: 2023-11-18 08:41:11 »
Cada ser vivo é um ganho de complexidade
que, consumindo energia, canaliza-a
para uma ordem biológica
individual e da espécie,
a qual, tendencial
e global mente
mais contribui
para a desordem
entrópica do equilíbrio terminal.

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1861 em: 2023-11-18 14:17:05 »
Cada ser vivo é um ganho de complexidade
que, consumindo energia, canaliza-a
para uma ordem biológica
individual e da espécie,
a qual, tendencial
e global mente
mais contribui
para a desordem
entrópica do equilíbrio terminal.


Pois...   :) 

Como bem disse Gail Tverberg: "The Universe is made up of many temporary structures, each of which needs to “dissipate” energy to stay away from a cold, dead state".

...quanto à "desordem entrópica do equilíbrio terminal" pois, é uma verdade muito aborrecida...   :(
« Última modificação: 2023-11-18 14:19:04 por Kaspov »
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

vbm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13829
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1862 em: 2023-11-18 17:04:21 »
O interessante é a inteligência dos viventes
ser ela mesma uma consequência da seta do tempo!
Somos seres irreversíveis e o próprio pensamento o é.

Tudo se cifra num lançamento de dados, com a fase livre
do indeterminismo da elevação seguido da descida ao abismo
e resultado fatalmente determinado: «Allia Jacta Est!» - diziam
os Romanos e assim é a existência. Pensamos e prevemos os eventos
sujeitando-os a uma compreensão por causalidade. E realmente a selecção natural
encarrega-se de operar a distinção entre os que demoram muito tempo
a distinguir uma casualidade de uma causalidade, marcando-os
com a triste sina de tenderem a morrer antes de procriarem... (Williard Quine)
« Última modificação: 2023-11-18 17:04:59 por vbm »

vbm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13829
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1863 em: 2023-11-18 17:12:42 »
Mas, de qualquer maneira, antes do determinismo
há uma multiplicidade aberta de percursos.
E já o grande algebrista e poeta
persa do século XI,  vincava
os dos momentos do
lanço de dados,

nos seus imortais Rubaiyat

Fecha o teu Corão.
Pensa livremente,
E encara livremente o Céu e a Terra.

                    *

Os dedos deslizam, escrevem, e
Tendo escrito, continuam; e
Nem toda a tua vontade ou espírito
Os convencem a voltar
Para meia linha retirar,
Nem todas as tuas lágrimas
Para uma palavra apagar.

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1864 em: 2023-11-18 18:08:56 »
O interessante é a inteligência dos viventes
ser ela mesma uma consequência da seta do tempo!
Somos seres irreversíveis e o próprio pensamento o é.

Tudo se cifra num lançamento de dados, com a fase livre
do indeterminismo da elevação seguido da descida ao abismo
e resultado fatalmente determinado: «Allia Jacta Est!» - diziam
os Romanos e assim é a existência. Pensamos e prevemos os eventos
sujeitando-os a uma compreensão por causalidade. E realmente a selecção natural
encarrega-se de operar a distinção entre os que demoram muito tempo
a distinguir uma casualidade de uma causalidade, marcando-os
com a triste sina de tenderem a morrer antes de procriarem... (Williard Quine)



alea jacta est - Dicionário Online Priberam de Português

Dicionário Priberam da Língua Portuguesa

https://dicionario.priberam.org › alea jacta est

Origem etimológica: locução latina que significa "a sorte está lançada". Fonte: Suetónio , César (...)
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1865 em: 2023-11-18 22:57:29 »
Uma notícia interessante:


«OPEC Said To Consider Additional 1 Million Bpd Output Cut

By ZeroHedge - Nov 17, 2023, 2:10 PM CST


Two days ago, JPMorgan’s head of energy strategy Christyan Malek warned that amid the recent plunge in oil prices, driven as much by shorting CTAs (who today are in full-blown short squeeze panic mode) as the Biden admin, the oil market was underestimating the chances of deeper supply cuts during this month's Nov 26 OPEC+ meeting.

“The market’s probably assuming very little chance of that happening, I’d say it’s much higher than that – not as a base case but as a scenario” Malek told Bloomberg in an interview, adding that deeper curbs would be "in order to get ahead of potential weakness in the first half of next year."

“We may need to see” a cut “given where the balances are, particularly given the demand trending.” And while “there’s a view that Saudi is tapped out", Malek said that he doesn't believe that: "I think there’s more flex if they wish to cut. We could see them do sizable cuts from here; having said that, I think it’s more likely they’ll want to socialize them among their OPEC peers – a collective cut rather than one on their own.”

And so, from JPM's strategist to OPEC+'s ears because moments ago the FT reported that what until recently was unthinkable, is suddenly all too possible and largely thanks to the (mostly) Arabic resentment at what Israel is doing in Palestine: according to the FT, not only is Saudi Arabia prepared to prolong oil production cuts well into next year but Opec+ is weighing further reductions in response to falling prices and rising anger over the Israel-Hamas war.

Why? Because while OPEC+ is not getting directly involved in the Gaza war, it certainly did not expect the Biden oil trading desk to hammer oil as hard as it did. If anything, it was expecting oil prices to rise above $100. Or as the FT puts it, "an additional Opec+ cut of up to 1mn b/d could be on the table, one informed person said, describing the cartel as “galvanised” by the conflict."

Related: Russia Removes Gasoline Export Ban As Domestic Market Stabilizes

Naturally, the further cuts - which are under discussion by Opec+ as it prepares to meet in Vienna on November 26 - could further inflame tensions with the US, although it appears that nobody in the cartel is even remotely worried about angering the senile US president who just got schooled by "dictator" Xi Jinping during his recent tour of China's California colony.

There's more: Opec+ is clearly not happy that the US is so openly on the side of Israel in the Gaza conflict. And while the oil price drop is the main cause, "members are also indignant at Israel’s war on Hamas and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza" the FT reports, adding that "Kuwait, Algeria and Iran are among the Opec members most agitated by the conflict."

“You should not underestimate the level of anger there is and the pressure leaders in the Gulf feel from their populations to be seen to respond in some manner,” said another person close to senior Opec figures in the Gulf, effectively confirming that an Opec+ production cut would directly target Biden's policies meant to keep the price of oil (and gas) as low as possible into the 2024 election.

The person said there would be no repeat of the oil shock of the 1970s, when Arab states halted exports to the west. But they added: “People have become complacent about the potential to tighten oil supplies to send a subtle message, which will be well understood both in the streets and Washington DC.”

Joe Biden, having crushed the US middle class in the past three years with his catastrophic economic policies, is facing an impossible re-election battle next year where he is already losing against his predecessor Donald Trump according to multiple polls, and the White House is struggling to convince voters that the country’s economy is healthy. The only thing it has to show: oil gas prices (which are largely the result of markets pricing in the coming recession). If Opec+ can send oil prices soaring again, then Biden is completely finished.

Some more from the FT:

    The people close to Saudi Arabia’s thinking stressed that no final decision had yet been made. They emphasised that any public statements by Saudi Arabia’s energy minister, Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, would keep the focus on the oil market, rather than the Israel-Hamas war.

    Prince Abdulaziz recently hit out at hedge funds that have increased their bets against oil, amid expectations that the market may move into a small surplus next year because of the weak global economy and rising supplies outside Opec.

    Other analysts suggested that Prince Abdulaziz could push other countries to deepen cuts — or comply with past commitments to reduce production — by threatening that Saudi Arabia could shift back towards full production unless such steps are taken.

It's not just Saudis that want oil as high as possible: Russia depends heavily on oil to finance its invasion of Ukraine, and has been increasing seaborne exports in recent months. However, if it means boosting oil prices, even Putin would be willing to seek a sharp if brief production cut, just enough to spark a worldwide energy panic.

Meanwhile, the economic reform program of Prince Abdulaziz’s half-brother, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman requires an oil price close to $100 a barrel: the plan ranges from building hypermodern cities to hosting the 2034 football World Cup.

Ahead of the FT report, it appears that the news had leaked far and wide, and after plunging into a bear market amid CTA liquidations, we have seen a complete reversal in the price of Brent, as if yesterday never happened.

By Zerohedge.com»


(ZeroHedge - The leading economics blog online covering financial issues, geopolitics and trading)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWagvaJlRT4&t=4649s
« Última modificação: 2023-11-18 22:59:59 por Kaspov »
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

AI Operator

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Mensagens: 22
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1866 em: 2023-11-19 19:24:05 »

Tudo se cifra num lançamento de dados, com a fase livre
do indeterminismo da elevação seguido da descida ao abismo
e resultado fatalmente determinado: «Allia Jacta Est!» - diziam
os Romanos e assim é a existência.



alea jacta est - Dicionário Online Priberam de Português

Dicionário Priberam da Língua Portuguesa

https://dicionario.priberam.org › alea jacta est

Origem etimológica: locução latina que significa "a sorte está lançada". Fonte: Suetónio , César (...)

Corrigindo a correctora e o Priberam (que como dicionário não interessa nem ao menino Jesus):

A frase 'A sorte está lançada', utilizada frequentemente em Português, referindo a proferida por César, é literalmente incorrecta. 'Lançar as sortes' é um termo de origem bíblica:

"E disseram cada um ao seu companheiro: Vinde, e lancemos sortes, para sabermos por que causa nos sobreveio este mal. E lançaram sortes, e a sorte caiu sobre Jonas." (Jonas 1:7)".

Hoje, a frase 'tirar à sorte' é utilizada com o mesmo significado. Tirar à sorte com pauzinhos: quem tirar o mais pequeno é o escolhido. Ou lançar uma moeda ao ar - Cara ou Coroa.

Dá para ver que não é o que o Júlio queria transmitir.

Ora bem: vamos a ver se não gasto o meu Latim!

Alea - Dado (de jogar). Cubo com seis faces, numerado de um a seis.
Iacta - A palavra Latina "iacta," é o particípio passado perfeito do verbo "iacio" (lançar). Esta forma verbal não existe em português e teremos que usar o pretérito perfeito 'lançado'.

Iacta é escrito em Latim com 'I'. O 'J' não existia ao tempo do grande Júlio; apareceu como uma variante do "I" nos alfabetos Latinos medievais. Por isso o Júlio não era Julius mas sim Iulius. Era o seu 'nomen'. O seu nome próprio (praenomen) era Gaius. César (Caesar) era o seu cognome (cognomen, um tipo de alcunha de família, ou ramo da família (gens) Iulia), originalmente denotando um antepassado com uma farta cabeleira. O que não deixa de ser irónico porque parece que o Júlio era capilarmente pobre no toutiço e importava-se bastante com isso.

Est - É a terceira pessoa do singular do presente do indicativo do verbo "esse," que significa "Ser" ou "Estar".

Alea iacta est - 'O dado está lançado' ou 'O dado foi lançado'.

que penso significar,  O dado já foi lançado e está a ponto de aterrar, mas o desfecho não é ainda conhecido.

Também já ouvi dizer 'os dados estão lançados'. Se fosse assim, a expressão em Latim seria:

"Aleae iactae sunt."

"Aleae" é o plural de "alea," significando "dados"
"Iactae" é o plural de Iacta.
"Sunt" é a terceira pessoa do plural do verbo "esse" significando ser ou estar.

Também não parece que tenha sido isto que o velho Júlio Cabeludo disse.

Cum omni veneratione,
AI0

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1867 em: 2023-11-19 19:50:43 »

Tudo se cifra num lançamento de dados, com a fase livre
do indeterminismo da elevação seguido da descida ao abismo
e resultado fatalmente determinado: «Allia Jacta Est!» - diziam
os Romanos e assim é a existência.



alea jacta est - Dicionário Online Priberam de Português

Dicionário Priberam da Língua Portuguesa

https://dicionario.priberam.org › alea jacta est

Origem etimológica: locução latina que significa "a sorte está lançada". Fonte: Suetónio , César (...)

Corrigindo a correctora e o Priberam (que como dicionário não interessa nem ao menino Jesus):

A frase 'A sorte está lançada', utilizada frequentemente em Português, referindo a proferida por César, é literalmente incorrecta. 'Lançar as sortes' é um termo de origem bíblica:

"E disseram cada um ao seu companheiro: Vinde, e lancemos sortes, para sabermos por que causa nos sobreveio este mal. E lançaram sortes, e a sorte caiu sobre Jonas." (Jonas 1:7)".

Hoje, a frase 'tirar à sorte' é utilizada com o mesmo significado. Tirar à sorte com pauzinhos: quem tirar o mais pequeno é o escolhido. Ou lançar uma moeda ao ar - Cara ou Coroa.

Dá para ver que não é o que o Júlio queria transmitir.

Ora bem: vamos a ver se não gasto o meu Latim!

Alea - Dado (de jogar). Cubo com seis faces, numerado de um a seis.
Iacta - A palavra Latina "iacta," é o particípio passado perfeito do verbo "iacio" (lançar). Esta forma verbal não existe em português e teremos que usar o pretérito perfeito 'lançado'.

Iacta é escrito em Latim com 'I'. O 'J' não existia ao tempo do grande Júlio; apareceu como uma variante do "I" nos alfabetos Latinos medievais. Por isso o Júlio não era Julius mas sim Iulius. Era o seu 'nomen'. O seu nome próprio (praenomen) era Gaius. César (Caesar) era o seu cognome (cognomen, um tipo de alcunha de família, ou ramo da família (gens) Iulia), originalmente denotando um antepassado com uma farta cabeleira. O que não deixa de ser irónico porque parece que o Júlio era capilarmente pobre no toutiço e importava-se bastante com isso.

Est - É a terceira pessoa do singular do presente do indicativo do verbo "esse," que significa "Ser" ou "Estar".

Alea iacta est - 'O dado está lançado' ou 'O dado foi lançado'.

que penso significar,  O dado já foi lançado e está a ponto de aterrar, mas o desfecho não é ainda conhecido.

Também já ouvi dizer 'os dados estão lançados'. Se fosse assim, a expressão em Latim seria:

"Aleae iactae sunt."

"Aleae" é o plural de "alea," significando "dados"
"Iactae" é o plural de Iacta.
"Sunt" é a terceira pessoa do plural do verbo "esse" significando ser ou estar.

Também não parece que tenha sido isto que o velho Júlio Cabeludo disse.

Cum omni veneratione,
AI0


Muito interessante!  É sempre bom aprender um pouco de Latim e de História!!   :)
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1868 em: 2023-11-20 23:39:59 »
Efeitos das recentes eleições argentinas  (y Viva la Vaca Muerta!   :) ):


«Oil Giant YPF Surges 40% After Outsider Wins Argentinian Presidential Election

By Charles Kennedy - Nov 20, 2023, 11:00 AM CST


    Javier Milei won the presidency in a runoff vote on Sunday amid a severe economic crisis in Argentina.

    Argentina's oil and gas firm YPF SA saw its share price soar 42% on Monday.

    Weeks before the election, Argentina was rocked by an unprecedented shortage of gasoline.


Join Our Community

Vaca Muerta


The New York-listed shares of Argentinian oil and gas firm YPF SA (NYSE: YPF) jumped by 42% early on Monday after far-right outsider Javier Milei won the presidential election in Argentina in a victory over his left-wing rival, current economy minister Sergio Massa.

Milei won the presidency in a runoff vote on Sunday amid a severe economic crisis in Argentina.

Weeks before the election, Argentina was rocked by an unprecedented shortage of gasoline, with drivers running the gauntlet to find scarce supplies of gas to fill their tanks amid what Reuters has called "the most acute fuel shortage in years", which has left many filling stations out of supply and long lines at any pumps still operating.

Inflation rates in Argentina are exceeding 140% and the economy is in disarray. The country has been in and out of severe economic crises for decades and has defaulted on its international sovereign debt three times since 2001. Currently, poverty is affecting over two-fifths of the population of around 46 million people.

Milei, who describes himself as an “anarcho-capitalist” of the antiestablishment, ran on a platform that included taking a “chainsaw” to public spending and reducing the state sector. Other proposals of the newly elected president include adopting the U.S. dollar in the Argentinian economy and prioritizing trade relations with capitalist nations like the United States over China.

The president-elect has also promised to “burn down” the Argentinian central bank. Milei has also said he would aim to reduce the role of the government in the economy.

In his first speech as president-elect, however, Milei struck a more moderate tone.

Following Milei’s election win, state-controlled oil firm YPF saw the highest gains on the stock markets. Shares in many banks also rallied, as did Argentinian bonds. But the Argentinian currency, the peso, came under pressure, investors told Reuters on Monday.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com»



https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Oil-Giant-YPF-Surges-40-After-Outsider-Wins-Argentinian-Presidential-Election.html
« Última modificação: 2023-11-20 23:40:44 por Kaspov »
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1869 em: 2023-11-20 23:42:51 »
Entretanto, as viagens parecem estar em alta:


«Thanksgiving Travel Surges To Pre-Covid Peaks, Marking A Return To Normalcy

By ZeroHedge - Nov 16, 2023, 11:00 AM CST

    49.1 million Americans are expected to hit the highways this Thanksgiving.

    4.7 million people are expected to fly, an increase of 6.6% from 2022, the highest level since 2005.

    Pump prices for unleaded fuel are marginally lower when compared with the same period last year.


Join Our Community

Gasoline pump


The American Automobile Association's latest report forecasts that over 55.4 million Americans will travel at least 50 miles from home during the Thanksgiving holiday week, spanning five days from Nov. 22 to Nov. 26. This year's forecast is a 2.3% increase over the same period last year and the third highest forecast since AAA started tracking holiday travel in 2000. The other two years were 2015 and 2019, respectively.

Most Thanksgiving travelers will drive next week. As many as 49.1 million Americans are expected to hit the highways, an increase of 1.7% compared to 2022. While 4.7 million people are expected to fly, an increase of 6.6% from 2022, the highest level since 2005.

"For many Americans, Thanksgiving and travel go hand in hand, and this holiday, we expect more people on the roads, skies, and seas compared to 2022," said Paula Twidale, Senior Vice President of AAA Travel.

Twidale said, "Travel demand has been strong all year, and AAA's Thanksgiving forecast reflects that continued desire to get away and spend time with loved ones."

AAA noted Tuesday and Wednesday before Thanksgiving are the busiest air travel days. Sunday is the busiest day to return home, AAA data showed.

Pump prices for unleaded fuel are marginally lower when compared with the same period last year.

Overall Busiest Day to Drive

"Hybrid schedules and remote schedules have changed everything," Aixa Diaz of AAA told CNN, adding, "Now people can leave for holiday travel at different times."

By Zerohedge.com»


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Thanksgiving-Travel-Surges-To-Pre-Covid-Peaks-Marking-A-Return-To-Normalcy.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1870 em: 2023-11-22 04:40:42 »
Acerca do progressivo falhanço das energias ditas "verdes":


«The Dramatic Downfall of ESG Investing

By Tsvetana Paraskova - Nov 21, 2023, 6:00 PM CST


    Investors withdrew $14.2 billion from U.S. sustainable funds over the past year.
    Global renewable energy funds experienced record outflows in Q3 2023, with stocks plummeting amid rising costs and market challenges.
    Political and regulatory changes, including challenges to the Biden Administration's ESG rule and SEC's anti-greenwashing efforts, contribute to the decline in sustainable investing.


Join Our Community
ESG


Investors are withdrawing money from sustainable funds as the ESG enthusiasm of the past few years is waning amid high interest rates, poor returns, plunging renewable energy stocks, tightened SEC rules, and political backlash.   

Over the past year, investors have withdrawn a total of $14.2 billion from U.S. sustainable funds in four consecutive quarters of net withdrawals, data from Morningstar showed.

Green Energy Stocks Battered

Globally, renewable energy funds saw record outflows of money in the third quarter of 2023 as stocks of wind and solar developers and suppliers crashed amid rising costs, higher interest rates, and supply-chain challenges.

Renewable energy exchange traded funds (ETFs), tracking the performance of clean energy companies, suffered a total of $1.4 billion of outflows in the third quarter, the highest outflows of any previous quarter, according to data from LSEG Lipper cited by Reuters.

The record outflows between July and September only partially offset net inflows of $3.36 billion for the first half of 2023, the data showed.

A perfect storm of soaring costs, supply chain delays, rising interest rates, and low electricity prices at auctions have been hurting renewables-related companies in recent months.

“There’s a dark cloud hanging over green stocks,” Martin Frandsen, a portfolio manager at Principal Asset Management, told the Financial Times last month.

Investors Pull Billions From U.S. Sustainable Funds

It’s not only the recent flop in renewable energy stocks that’s keeping Wall Street away from sustainable investments. The high interest rates and politicians targeting sustainable investing have also played a role in investor decisions, industry executives and analysts say.

In the third quarter of 2023 alone, investors pulled $2.7 billion from U.S. sustainable funds, continuing a trend of net withdrawals that started in the fourth quarter of 2022, per data from Morningstar Direct.

“Although the motivations behind outflows cannot be perfectly quantified, many factors are in play. These include rising energy prices, high interest rates, concerns about greenwashing, and political backlash,” Alyssa Stankiewicz, an associate director of sustainability research for Morningstar, wrote in an analysis last month.

All U.S. funds also saw net withdrawals in the third quarter of 2023, but the demand drop in sustainable funds was steeper compared to conventional funds, according to Morningstar.

As a result of net withdrawals and poor performance, assets in sustainable funds dropped back below the $298.8 billion mark at the end of the third quarter—falling by 17% from the record-high of $358.2 billion at the end of 2021 but up by 10% from the recent low of $272.2 billion in the third quarter of 2022, Morningstar data showed.

Moreover, for the first time ever, more sustainable funds closed in the third quarter than the number of funds launched. Three new sustainable funds launched, and one existing fund was added to the sustainable funds landscape in Q3, while 13 sustainable funds closed and four funds moved away from ESG mandates, Morningstar said.

Columbia Threadneedle, Hartford, and BlackRock liquidated the largest sustainable funds in terms of assets in the third quarter.

As a result, the total number of sustainable open-end and exchange-traded funds in the United States were 661 at the end of the quarter.

After the third quarter, the list of the top 12 worst-performing ETFs in October was packed with thematic funds in the clean energy space, according to Morningstar Direct research from early November. Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure UCITS ETF, First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF, and the Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF were the biggest ETF losers.

New Rules And Political Backlash Discourage Sustainable Fund Investors

In recent months, the Biden Administration’s rule allowing employee retirement plans to consider ESG factors in investment decisions has been challenged by Republican-led states. Fund managers say the rule may have impacted the popularity of sustainable funds.

“We found that the demand for ESG investing, by financial professionals working with retirement-plan participants, was more limited than we anticipated,” Ron Rice, vice president of marketing at Pacific Financial, told The Wall Street Journal.

In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been stepping up efforts to combat the greenwashing of labeling funds as sustainable. The SEC updated in September the so-called Names Rule, requiring 80% of a fund’s portfolio to match the asset advertised by its name.

“The updated rule will apply not only to funds whose names suggest a focus in particular investments, industries, or geographies—but also to funds whose names suggest a focus in investments with particular characteristics. This includes names suggesting an investment focus on Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG)-related factors through names such as “sustainable,” “green,” or “socially responsible,” SEC chair Gary Gensler said.

In addition, sustainable investing in the U.S. has been criticized by Republican states, most notably Texas, which says that ESG standards are harming America’s energy industry and threatens millions of jobs. Texas prohibits state contracts and investments with companies that boycott energy companies.

At the end of last year, the Florida Treasury said it would divest $2 billion worth of assets under management by BlackRock because of the ESG investing by the world’s largest asset manager.

“If Larry, or his friends on Wall Street, want to change the world – run for office,” Florida Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Jimmy Patronis said at the time.

“Using our cash, however, to fund BlackRock’s social-engineering project isn’t something Florida ever signed up for.”   

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-Dramatic-Downfall-of-ESG-Investing.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

vbm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13829
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1871 em: 2023-11-22 08:10:44 »
E real mente, em prestar dinheiro a D. Branca's
sempre foi uma grande vigarice. Honesto,
é remunerar um juro módico
por dinheiro depositado, e
cobrar por empresa
arriscada, um
prémio de
risco +
juro.

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1872 em: 2023-11-25 22:43:29 »
Acerca das famosas emissões de C:


«Tiny Fraction Of Global Elites Emit As Much Carbon As Bottom Two-Thirds Of Humanity

Tyler Durden's Photo

by Tyler Durden

Saturday, Nov 25, 2023 - 03:30 AM


Authored by Tom Ozimek via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),


Critics who rail against the hypocrisy of wealthy global elites jet-setting on carbon-spewing private planes while pontificating about the need for the rest of us to cut our climate footprints just got a boost from a new study.
Jets airplanes are parked at the Dubendorf Air Base, east of Zurich on Jan. 18, 2023. (Sebastien Bozon/AFP via Getty Images)

It turns out that the world's richest 1 percent emit about the same amount of carbon as the world's poorest two-thirds, according to an analysis from the nonprofit Oxfam International.

This means that a small sliver of global elites, or 77 million people, have produced as much carbon as the 5 billion people that make up the bottom 66 percent by wealth, per the study.

The study also estimates that it would take roughly 1,500 years for someone in the bottom 99 percent to produce as much carbon as the wealthiest billionaires do in just one year.

The study was based on research compiled by the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) and examined the emissions of various income groups up to 2019. In summary, it suggested that the private jet-setting class of global leaders and policymakers, who take private planes to lead summits addressing the assumed dangers of climate change, may warrant charges of hypocrisy.

The analysis was published as global leaders prepare to meet for climate talks at the COP28 summit in Dubai later in November, where, much like other climate conferences, some elite participants will likely pontificate on the need for ordinary folk to end their reliance on cheap fossil fuel energy to make their ends meet.
'Ludicrous Hypocrisy'

Global leaders and policymakers fixated on fighting the supposed ills of carbon emissions because of models predicting dangerous climate change have often drawn criticism for their use of carbon-spewing private jets.

For instance, private jet use during last year's meetings in Davos, Switzerland, pushed up carbon emissions by four times over the average week.

During the World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos between May 22, 2022, and May 26, 2022, 1,040 private jets flew in and out of airports serving Davos, according to a January report by Greenpeace.

The number of jets going in and out of Davos doubled during that week, resulting in 9,700 tons of carbon dioxide emissions, which is equivalent to roughly 350,000 average cars.

The majority of these jets were attributed to private flights undertaken by participants for the WEF meeting.

Klara Maria Schenk, a transport campaigner for Greenpeace’s European mobility campaign, called the private jet use at Davos a “distasteful masterclass of hypocrisy,” given that the WEF claims to be committed to the Paris Climate Target of keeping climate warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

“Davos has a perfectly adequate railway station, still these people can’t even be bothered to take the train for a trip as short as 21 [kilometers]. Do we really believe that these are the people to solve the problems the world faces?” Ms. Schenk said.

It was much the same story for the 2021 COP26 climate conference in Glasgow, Scotland, where about 400 or so global leaders showed up on private jets, according to the Daily Mail.

"All this for 'climate' negotiations that obviously could have been done just as easily over Zoom or something similar for the negligible results that emerge," award-winning novelist Roger L. Simon, a contributor to The Epoch Times, wrote in an op-ed titled "The Ludicrous Hypocrisy of Climate Conferences Continues."
'Climate Czar' In Crosshairs

Private jets are estimated to emit 10 times more carbon dioxide per person compared to commercial flights and roughly 50 times when compared to trains. In total, aviation accounts for roughly 2 percent of carbon emissions globally.

Criticism over his use of a private jet to fly to climate summits may have been a factor in the decision of the family of John Kerry, special climate envoy of President Joe Biden, to sell the family's private airplane.

Mr. Kerry drew criticism when, in 2019, he flew on a private jet to Iceland to accept an award for his climate leadership. According to some estimates, a round trip to Iceland by private jet would emit about 90 tons of carbon. By comparison, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that a typical passenger vehicle produces about 4.6 tons of carbon in a year.

Mr. Kerry's family quietly sold off its Gulfstream G-IV jet last summer.

However, Mr. Kerry has defended his use of a private jet while being a prominent figure seeking to draw attention to climate change. In 2021, Mr. Kerry defended his decision to fly to Iceland to accept the climate change leadership award.

“If you offset your carbon, it’s the only choice for somebody like me, who is traveling the world to win this battle," Mr. Kerry said at the time.

The president's special climate envoy drew criticism from Republican lawmakers.

"I’m not sure flying across the world in a private jet while simultaneously trying to put the workers who supply your fuel out of a job is a winning strategy as climate czar," Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) wrote in a post on X, referring to reports about Mr. Kerry's remarks.

Naveen Athrapully and Ryan Morgan contributed to this report.»


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tiny-fraction-global-elites-emit-much-carbon-bottom-two-thirds-humanity
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1873 em: 2023-11-25 22:54:16 »
E acerca da obsessão pelos EV's:



«The Pricey Reality Behind Biden's EV Aspirations

By ZeroHedge - Nov 25, 2023, 2:00 PM CST


Join Our Community

Biden presser

The Biden administration is pushing for widespread electrification in less than 20 years through government subsidies and coercive regulations as part of its aggressive climate agenda. The truth is that President Joe Biden’s goals are an illusion at the expense of the American people.

While EV proponents try to claim that EVs will soon be cheaper than gasoline vehicles, our new research demonstrates that EVs benefitted from hidden subsidies that total nearly $50,000 per EV.

Who is footing that bill? Gasoline vehicle owners, taxpayers, and utility ratepayers are.

Electric vehicles primarily benefit from regulatory credits and generous fuel economy standards, which average $27,881 per vehicle. EVs have been given an unlawful 6.67 multiplier to their rated fuel economy, so that an EV with a rated fuel economy of 100 miles per gallon is credited as if it is getting 667 miles per gallon. What’s more, the EPA’s proposed fuel economy standards are designed to require that 67% of new passenger cars sold be all-electric by 2032, demonstrating a clear government preference toward EVs without proper consideration of costs and benefits.

For gasoline vehicles, the price you see at the gas pump covers the cost of extracting, refining, and transporting the gasoline, but the same cannot be said for the cost of charging an EV. EVs require new charging infrastructure, and their large power draw increases the strain on electricity infrastructure. As our research highlights, a typical EV charging overnight at home consumes as much power as several homes, and an EV charging at a fast-charging station in 30 minutes consumes as much power as a small to medium-sized grocery store. A few extra EVs in the neighborhoods are manageable, but widespread EV adoption will require significant and expensive grid upgrades.

Adding insult to injury, EV owners alone aren’t shouldering these increased electricity costs, which average $11,833 per vehicle over 10 years. Until a utility starts charging EV owners for the extra infrastructure costs to serve them, those costs are shared among all the utility’s customers. Residential electricity costs across the U.S. have risen 20% over the last three years, and a rapid forced adoption of EVs will only make this problem worse.

Direct federal and state subsidies provide EVs with another $8,984 per vehicle over 10 years, including the widely publicized $7,500 federal tax credit in the so-called Inflation Reduction Act and smaller state subsidies for EVs. All these subsidies, of course, are borne by the American taxpayer.

President Biden’s expensive green pipe dream is not without irony.

While Biden administration claims that these draconian EV mandates are necessary to combat climate change, the widespread adoption of EVs in the developed world would have negligible effects on global emissions and climate. For starters, if EVs are able to displace all the carbon emissions from U.S. passenger cars, that would only cut out 20% of U.S. carbon emissions. Our calculations show that even if the U.S. eliminated all of its carbon emissions by 2050, the effect on global temperatures in 2100 would only be 0.08 degrees Celsius.

But EVs will not even get us that far because they don’t cut carbon emissions much—if at all—compared  to gasoline vehicles. As pointed out by Mark Mills in a recent op-ed in Real Clear Energy, it is nearly impossible to measure an individual EV’s emissions. While driving an EV itself does not directly produce emissions, the emissions to generate the electricity used to charge EVs vary widely depending on location.

EV batteries also require fossil fuels to produce, and many components of EV batteries are made in emissions-heavy China. The emissions resulting from mining and processing the materials used in the battery are largely unreported, and the emissions during EV production could potentially be enough to wipe out the emissions saved by not combusting gasoline.

A recent study by Volvo attempts to quantify some of these factors, and the result is not rosy for EVs. The lifetime emissions of the electric version of the Volvo SUV at the center of the study are only a third less than the emissions of the gasoline version, and that is when it is charged on the carbon-light European grid. Different assumptions could lead to an EV emitting more carbon than its gasoline counterpart. The obvious conclusion is that without rapid reductions in carbon emissions from the electric grid, an equally Herculean task to EV mass adoption, EVs will continue to produce significant carbon emissions.

Emissions from gasoline vehicles are projected to decline 20% over the next decade, and hybrids, which nearly double the fuel efficiency of a gasoline vehicle with a battery that is 50-100 times smaller than an EV battery, would actually produce the least amount of lifetime emissions. But the net-zero advocates are needlessly demanding all EVs—or nothing.
Related: China's Global Economic Dominance Begins to Wane

EVs would also have little impact on levels of actual pollution in U.S. cities, like soot and smog, because the U.S. is already a world leader in clean air. When the number of passenger cars on the road fell by half during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, there was no measurable impact on air quality in the U.S. Our air pollution levels are so close their natural state that weather has a far greater impact on pollution levels in most U.S. cities than the emissions from our vehicles.

The reality is, EVs are not going away any time soon, but neither are cars in general. Americans are still driving at nearly the same rate they were before the COVID-19 pandemic—more than 3.2 trillion miles total annually. Even the addition of a few hundred million new EVs over the next decade, up from 20 million today, will only account for approximately 10-20% of all passenger vehicles globally.[GU1] [GU2] [3]  Currently, 90% of EVs in the U.S. are purchased as a second or third car, usually in addition to a gasoline vehicle. If the U.S. were to adopt the Biden administration’s preferred number EVs, consumers would have to purchase EVs at a scale and velocity 10 times greater and faster than any new model car in history.

Even this isn’t enough to achieve the left’s dystopian net-zero goals. The International Energy Agency forecasts [GU4] the number of global households without a car needs to rise from 45% today to 70% to achieve net-zero by 2050. That’s right—70% of people around the world must not have a car to meet the global elite’s climate goals. Most of the 45% of households who do not own cars are in developing world and crave the kind of personal mobility we enjoy in the U.S. and in Europe, but net-zero will require them to remain confined forever or to rely solely on government-owned transit. Even the developed world will have to cut its driving dramatically. In California, regulators predicted [GU5] that the state’s emissions goals will require Californians to both buy EVs and reduce miles driven by 25%.

Coercing American citizens into buying EVs is simply untenable and is not truly environmentally friendly. As our research shows, EV subsidies and mandates are already costing Americans $22 billion annually, and that amount is set to rise dramatically, with particularly adverse impacts on lower-income Americans. The Biden administration would be wise to end its special treatment of EVs, prioritize the American consumer, and stop driving the U.S. auto industry off a cliff.

Brent Bennett, Ph.D., is the policy director for Life:Powered, an initiative of the Texas Public Policy Foundation to raise America’s energy IQ, and a former battery researcher and engineer. Andrea Hitt is a communications manager for the Texas Public Policy Foundation and previously served as communications director for Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ).

Authored by Brent Bennett & Andrea Hitt via RealClear Wire»


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-Pricey-Reality-Behind-Bidens-EV-Aspirations.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1874 em: 2023-11-26 02:19:15 »
Acerca da famosa e fantástica "ESG":



«ESG Grift Endgame: Deutsche CIO Now Says Oil Companies Have A Place In ESG Funds

Tyler Durden's Photo

by Tyler Durden

Sunday, Nov 26, 2023 - 01:25 AM


At the end of the day, it always winds up reverting to common sense and, in the investing world, alpha.

That's what has Markus Müller, chief investment officer ESG at Deutsche Bank's Private Bank, admitting this week that if you want to make money - no matter what you label your fund - you're likely going to need some exposure to energy and big oil. He also noted the obvious: that big oil companies have, in fact, been making strides to reduce emissions, despite being labeled as serial polluters with 'more money than God' by the Biden administration and their cronies.

Reuters dropped a bomb last week when they reported that Müller had stated on Tuesday that sustainability funds should include traditional energy stocks, arguing that not doing so deprives investors of a prime opportunity to invest in the transition to renewable energy.

"When we think about clean energy, these are business models which are quite new and sensitive to interest rates," he said.

Since the surge in fossil fuel prices following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, fossil fuel stocks have seen significant growth, resulting in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) funds underperforming in comparison.

Müller emphasized that investors focused on sustainability require more detailed disclosures from companies about their shift to lower-carbon operations and clearer regulations for labeling funds concentrating on the transition.

He said that ESG strategies vary, with many funds currently investing in fossil fuels, but impending stricter regulations may lead to more exclusions. For instance, France plans to prohibit 'ISR' labeled funds from investing in new fossil fuel projects from 2025. Currently, about 45% of funds, amounting to 7 billion euros, have traditional energy investments.

Deutsche Bank's Chief Investment Office ESG survey indicates sustained investor interest in sustainability, with energy transition being the top investment choice, surpassing artificial intelligence. However, confidence in ESG factors for risk management is declining, with only 37% agreeing it's effective, down from previous years.

The survey, with 1,759 mostly European respondents, revealed that just 15% have a solid understanding of ESG, and a mere 3% consider themselves experts.

It's not surprising, as we have been calling out ESG as a grift since the virtue signaling "trend" was born from the soil of near-unlimited liquidity during the Covid years. Recall, back in August we noted that companies with good ESG scores polluted just as much as those with low ones.

Scientific Beta, an index provider and consultancy, found tjhis summer that companies rated highly on ESG metrics - and even just the 'Environmental' variable alone - often pollute just as much as other companies.

Researchers look at ESG scores from Moody’s, MSCI and Refinitiv when performing the analysis. They found that when the 'E' component was singled out, it led to a “substantial deterioration in green performance”.

Felix Goltz, research director at Scientific Beta told the Financial Times back in August: “ESG ratings have little to no relation to carbon intensity, even when considering only the environmental pillar of these ratings. It doesn’t seem that people have actually looked at [the correlations]. They are surprisingly low.”

He added: "The carbon intensity reduction of green [ie low carbon intensity] portfolios can be effectively cancelled out by adding ESG objectives."

Also, let's not forget about the 'greenwashing' across the ESG industry.

In September, we noted that ESG fund closures in 2023 had surpassed all of the last three years.

Data from Morningstar showed State Street, Columbia Threadneedle Investments, Janus Henderson Group, and Hartford Funds Management Group have unwound more than two dozen ESG funds this year. The latest unwind comes from BlackRock, who told regulators in September it plans to close two ESG emerging-market bond funds with total assets of $55 million.

So far this year, the number of ESG funds closing is more than the last three years combined. This trend comes as investors pull money out of these funds as the ESG bubble has likely popped.

We asked this question in early summer: Is The ESG Investing Boom Already Over?

In January, BlackRock's Larry Fink told Bloomberg TV at the World Economic Forum in Davos that ESG investing has been tarnished:

     "Let's be clear, the narrative is ugly, the narrative is creating this huge polarization. "

Fink continued:

    "We are trying to address the misconceptions. It's hard because it's not business any more, they're doing it in a personal way. And for the first time in my professional career, attacks are now personal. They're trying to demonize the issues."

By June, Fink's BlackRock dropped the term "ESG" following billions of dollars pulled out of its funds by Republican governors, most notably, $2 billion by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

The crux of the issue that Republican lawmakers have with radical ESG funds is that they were trying to impose 'green' initiatives on the corporate level to force change in society, and many of these initiatives would be widely unpopular at the ballot box during elections.

Remember these comments from Fink?

Alyssa Stankiewicz, associate director for sustainability research at Morningstar, told Bloomberg, "We have definitely seen demand drop off in 2022 and 2023."

And hey, don't say we didn't warn you; we have been writing about the ESG con for years now...»



https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/esg-grift-endgame-deutsche-cio-now-says-oil-companies-have-place-esg-funds
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1875 em: 2023-11-27 03:14:44 »
O frio chegou...   :(


«European Natural Gas Demand Rises as Winter Arrives

By Tsvetana Paraskova - Nov 24, 2023, 6:44 AM CST


    European natural gas demand is now rising due to cold weather, with colder temperatures expected both this weekend and next.
    European natural gas prices have risen in recent days due to higher demand but were trading slightly lower on Friday morning.
    High inventory levels and a steady supply of LNG are keeping prices subdued despite rising demand.

Join Our Community

natural gas


Europe’s weaker natural gas demand in the autumn is now rising amid lower-than-usual temperatures in most areas and freezing weather expected to last until early December. 

The forecast for many countries, including Europe’s largest economy and natural gas user, Germany, has been updated to expect colder temperatures this weekend and next week, according to forecasts from Maxar Technologies cited by Bloomberg.

On Friday, the front-month Dutch TTF Natural Gas Futures, the benchmark for Europe’s gas trading, were slightly down by 0.7% to $50.76 (46.50 euros) per megawatt-hour (MWh) as of 11:32 a.m. GMT. Gas prices rose in the previous days as heating demand increased.

But the market isn’t as nervous as it was last year, mostly due to the still ample inventories at EU gas storage sites. As of November 22, EU storage was 98.4% full, according to data from Gas Infrastructure Europe.

Europe’s gas prices started rising last week as the market began to focus on winter supply risks. Natural gas traders are already weighing the potential risks to European gas supply this winter, with weather the biggest unknown for traders, suppliers, and governments.

In early November, traders began withdrawing natural gas from Europe’s record-high inventories as the weather turned colder and heating demand rose.

For now, record-high inventories and steady LNG inflows are giving Europe confidence that last year’s energy crisis will not repeat itself.

However, the calmness in the market could turn into volatile turbulence again if fresh supply concerns emerge and if this winter is really cold in Europe and/or Asia.

Governments and markets should be anything but complacent as risks of tighter markets and soaring prices remain, analysts and forecasters say. No one can predict how cold this winter in the northern hemisphere will be. Last winter was mercifully warmer than usual in Europe just as the continent was scrambling to import higher LNG volumes despite spiking prices to replace the lost Russian pipeline gas supply.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/European-Natural-Gas-Demand-Rises-as-Winter-Arrives.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1876 em: 2023-11-29 19:20:36 »
Um artigo interessante, acerca de energia, “energy transition”, petróleo, carvão, metais, EVs, etc.:


«Bob's Electric Car Warning: You're Basically Buying Your Wife a Coal-Powered Ride!

Capitalist Exploits's Photo

by Capitalist Exploits

Tuesday, Nov 28, 2023 - 11:13


Billionaire mining financier Robert Friedland recently gave a 40-minute speech on green energy, electrification, metal scarcity, and more.



It’s fair to say the hairy armpit crowd aren’t going to be too happy with Bob. Here’s some nuggets to chew on, summarised by a gent on Twitter X.

For the life of me, I can’t recall who it was now, so credit is due to the mystery tweeter who summarised Bob’s speech.

What does “energy transition” mean?


    “You have a billion people that burn firewood to live. They have no access to electrical energy.”

    “We’re burning more coal and more oil today than in the history of the world.”

    “We spent $4T putting up solar panels for hydrocarbons to still capture 83% of energy source.”

    “You’re not going to stop global warming by buying an electric car.”


On electric cars and EV batteries

    “With current lithium-ion technology, the destruction we cause, the global warming gas we cause, we might as well sit on our chairs and do nothing.”
    “You just bought your wife a coal-burning car by buying an EV.”
    “The current generation of EV batteries will be toast in 2-3 years.”
    “I would short every lithium company in the world.”
    “We’re going to kill the lithium hydroxide business over time.”

Common metals vital for the transition

    “If we’re going to have a transition, we need common and abundant materials. We can’t rely on things like nickel.”
    “The batteries they’re making now are low-grade lithium metal. You don’t need nickel, cobalt, graphite, They’re out the window.”
    “You want batteries made out of common materials so billions of people can use it.”

Womb to tomb examination of net zero

    “Look at the whole system if you’re trying to eliminate global warming.”
    “The Chinese are saying 2060 and India is now saying 2070. What does that tell you?” “There’s zero chance that the twelve major automakers will find enough nickel to make their batteries.”
    “The amount of metal we need doesn’t exist currently in a way that’s green or sustainable. It’s apparent to any readily intelligible person.”
    “How can we stop burning coal and oil and not have an energy transition?”

Two competing paradigms

    “We have two competing tribes. One tribe says ‘I want to save the world, I’m green, I need cobalt, nickel, platinum, or palladium’. The other tribe says ‘Holy shit, the Army/Navy wants these metals for national defense.'”
    “The intensity of metal demand in conflict is beyond your wildest imagination. In WWI you needed a telescope to see the price of copper.”
    “So we’re heading to a world where both tribes have a strong demand for more metals. We’re balkanizing the world into two camps and its tearing the global supply chains apart.”

A very difficult time

    “It does appear that the world is warming, and there’s zero chance we’ll reduce that. The question is how bad will it get?”
    “I was in CA recently, it was $6.20 per gallon. The average citizen is pissed off.”
    “I agree with Jamie Dimon that this is the most dangerous time since I’ve been alive.”
    “The Fed are idiots. They told us that inflation was over. And it’s not even close.”

We need to reinvent the mining industry

    “First of all, we have to try to mine in the United States. No intelligent person has tried to do that in the last few generations.”
    “Everything is blown out of proportion because mining is viewed as a bad thing.”
    “We also have to determine what metals we actually need for the future. Which is copper.” “Imagine you’re plugging an EV w/ 1MW charger. Our grid is literally a 110 year old lady waiting to die. The Chinese tell me it will take $21T to rebuild the electrical grid.”
    “Our grid is like balancing a pencil vertically on your palm. There’s no storage there.”
    “The symbol of the US, the bald eagle, is flying into offshore windmills. They’re just chewing them up. Who wants to live near them? They’re very low density.”
    “At least real miners know how hard it is to actually find metals and mine it.”

Energy consumption

    “A Google search requires 1,000 joules of electrical energy. You think it’s free, but it’s paid for by advertising.”
    “You think the internet is green? You know how much energy it requires to use AI/ChatGPT? You think Bitcoin/crypto is green?”

Importance of copper

    “I don’t know if we need gold. But I do know we need copper. And we need it really badly.” “Having said that, I’d rather there be gold in my copper. Because people will always want gold.”
    “People are getting rid of their excess copper because they’re de-stocking to reduce their interest cost. But we’re nearing the end of de-stocking and paper selling.”
    “This huge clash is coming between Army, Navy, Air Force and the Greening of the world economy. And the miners have an unbelievable burden to make that happen.”
    “At the same time we need these metals, it’s harder to get the equipment needed to mine the metal!”
    “The miners have a very important role to play to supply the world with the metals it desperately needs.”

Importance of Saudi Arabia

    “If Saudi Arabia can’t maintain basic energy security, we’ll have $200-$300 oil. We need stability in that pricing. At $100-$300 oil, people in Egypt don’t eat.”
    “Saudi is playing a beneficial role by keeping oil between $70-90 per barrel.”

Audience Q&A

    “The valuation of the mining industry relative to the S&P 500 is the lowest in living memory. The general person thinks that mining is evil and must be eliminated.”
    “50% of what goes into an EV is hydrocarbon. If we stopped producing oil, half of humanity would die from starvation.”
    “I don’t think we understand how formidable the Chinese are.”
    “In a Balkanized economy, we went from a Just-in-Time supply chain to a Just-in-Case supply chain.”
    “How much metal do we need to build nuclear reactors?
    How much steel, concrete, rebar, nuclear engineers do you need to build these things?” “The problem is that the world economy is Balkanized. Where is the steel coming from? Where are the pumps coming from? The French want nuclear power, and the Germans are burning coal. Even within Europe, its Balkanized. That’s all I see.”
    “I think the mining industry needs to defend itself more. Where do you think stuff comes from? There’s the hardware of the mine (tons, grade, engineering). Then there’s all the people around the mine (locals). There’s invariably a clash with the locals around the mine. Unless they’re buying into it, it’s not going to happen. That’s the software around mining.”

On knowing where things come from

    “People don’t realize where things come from. As people live in urban environments, they forget where things come from.”
    “We need to communicate the importance of mining and humanize it as an activity. We need to mine in the United States. We need to figure out what should be mined, where we’re allowed to mine, and how.”

Source: Insider 285 by @capitalistExp's»


https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2023-11-27/bobs-electric-car-warning-youre-basically-buying-your-wife-coal-powered-ride
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1877 em: 2023-11-29 19:31:20 »
A gasolina na CA parece estar bastante cara:

“I was in CA recently, it was $6.20 per gallon. The average citizen is pissed off.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2023-11-27/bobs-electric-car-warning-youre-basically-buying-your-wife-coal-powered-ride


&

«the US gallon (US gal), defined as 231 cubic inches (exactly 3.785411784 L),[1] which is used in the United States and some Latin American and Caribbean countries»

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallon



Outras cit. int. do art. cit. acima:

“A Google search requires 1,000 joules of electrical energy. You think it’s free, but it’s paid for by advertising.”

& tb:

“I agree with Jamie Dimon that this is the most dangerous time since I’ve been alive.”


https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2023-11-27/bobs-electric-car-warning-youre-basically-buying-your-wife-coal-powered-ride
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1878 em: 2023-11-30 15:07:48 »
A energia nuclear ganha terreno:


«Nuclear Energy: The New 'Sociopath-Approved' Solution to Climate Change!

Capitalist Exploits's Photo

by Capitalist Exploits

Thursday, Nov 30, 2023 - 11:15

AGREEING WITH SOCIOPATHS

Check out this:

    The US will lead a push at the COP28 climate summit to triple the amount of installed nuclear power capacity globally by 2050, marking a major turnaround for the controversial technology at the climate negotiations.

    The declaration will call on the World Bank and other international financial institutions to include nuclear energy in their lending policies, according to a document seen by Bloomberg News. The US will likely be joined by the UK, France, Sweden, Finland and South Korea in the pledge to be signed Dec. 1 in Dubai, according to people familiar with the matter.

    That will be followed a few days later by a nuclear industry commitment to triple generation resources from 2020 levels, said one of the people, who asked not to be named because the information isn’t public.

    “Nuclear is 100% part of the solution,” John Kerry, the US special presidential envoy for climate, said at the Bloomberg New Economy Forum last week. “It’s clean energy.

Well, for once we agree with John Kerry, but it beggars belief how long it took him to reach that conclusion. My guess is he’s invested in some company that will benefit. After all, we know that despite him being a sociopath he’s also a greedy bastard, so…

Regardless if the powers that be are only just waking up to the importance of nuclear energy and they want to triple generation from current levels, we wonder how high uranium will go?

What a slog uranium has been. We recall first buying into uranium in September/October 2016 when it was at $25. Well, you could say we got the bottom (near enough), but we weren’t picking on it being a four-year bottoming process. “Lucky” we were patient.


Are you buying Uranium?

Source: Insider 285 | Follow Capitalist Exploits | Subscribe»



https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2023-11-28/nuclear-energy-new-sociopath-approved-solution-climate-change
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5925
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1879 em: 2023-11-30 15:10:29 »
Boa notícia para o preço do crude:


«OPEC+ Agrees On 1 Million Bpd Additional Oil Supply Cut, Alongside Extension Of Saudi 1MMb/d Cut

Tyler Durden's Photo

by Tyler Durden

Thursday, Nov 30, 2023 - 02:49 PM


As previewed repeatedly in recent days, and as Reuters once again leaked overnight, moments ago the delayed OPEC+ meeting concluded with the expanded cartel agreeing on an additional 1 million barrels in production cuts, alongside an extension of Saudi Arabia's 1 million bpd in voluntary "lollipop" cuts.

While we wait for further details, there is speculation is that of the 1 million "additional" barrels, some 300kb/d is an extension of existing Russian cuts, which means an incremental 700kb/d in cuts are coming from the group. Furthermore, of the balance, 500kb/d may be from those overproducing on their existing quotas. Which would mean new cuts are really just 200kb/d.

In any case while we wait for details, Bloomberg's Julian Lee calculates that if the extra 1 million barrels a day cut is applied to the existing 2024 targets, with the various voluntary reductions applied on top of that, the new target for Saudi Arabia will be about 8.7 million barrels a day which is just over 200,000 barrels a day above the level to which it’s target was cut in the depths of the Covid-19 pandemic.

In other words, the oil market is about to get very, very tight especially if any of the multiple stimulus packages China is throwing around actually works and China's economy rebounds.

In response Crude rose just over 2% in New York, peaking around $79.5 before reversing some gains.»


https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/opec-agrees-1-million-bpd-additional-oil-supply-cut-alongside-extension-saudi-1mmbd-cut
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!