Olá, Visitante. Por favor entre ou registe-se se ainda não for membro.

Entrar com nome de utilizador, password e duração da sessão
 

Autor Tópico: Bitcoin - Tópico principal  (Lida 379120 vezes)

Zel

  • Visitante
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1080 em: 2017-09-15 22:18:40 »
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-14/bitcoin-crashes-chinese-trading-second-largest-exchange-halt-all-trading

deve haver gente que consegue arbitrar os diferentes precos de bitcoin, deve ser so mamar


Se não tiver moeda chinesa não consigo arbitrar certo? Tenho dúvida que dê para fazer short selling...


sim claro, precisas de comprar bitcoin por yuans para arbitrares

Local

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 15947
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1081 em: 2017-09-16 10:15:49 »
o que ele diz é que consegue minerar 2 moedas, quando vende essas duas moedas a outras duas pessoas, é lhe atribuído outras duas moedas moeda.

A criação de criptomoeda é apenas por mineração ou necessita de esquemas piramidais?

Nota, não percebo nada de criptomoedas mas gostaria de saber um pouco mais...

isso esta incorrecto , entao minera duas , vende duas e recebe duas? bem se vender tem que receber sempre algo em troca

se queres saber mais basta andares  umas paginas para tras ou entao https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLJkh3QjHsLtK0LZFd28oGg
O brasileiro confirma, em parte a posição do Cem.
Citar
Quem validar e registar as transações de Bitcoins recebe em troca, unidades de bitcoin.
“Our values are human rights, democracy and the rule of law, to which I see no alternative. This is why I am opposed to any ideology or any political movement that negates these values or which treads upon them once it has assumed power. In this regard there is no difference between Nazism, Fascism or Communism..”
Urmas Reinsalu

leprechaun

  • Visitante
Tempos difíceis para a Bitcoin
« Responder #1082 em: 2017-09-16 11:51:35 »
Desde que quase atingiu os $5000, logo no início do mês, o par BTC-USD está a sofrer uma correção mais profunda do que o habitual, que já levou a perder mais de 40% do seu valor, em apenas 2 semanas! Contudo, isto nem é assim tão invulgar com a moeda digital, pois também se verificou um fenómeno análogo após a chegada aos $3000, em meados de junho, embora não de uma forma tão brusca e rápida no tempo.

Relembro aqui a antevisão de Danny, após a BTC ter atingido o seu target nos $4246, há 2 meses atrás:

Citação de: Danny on August 14, 2017
Meanwhile my method shows two new price targets: $6430 could become relevant as a next top target or as a resistance zone on the way to even higher levels. And there is a bottom target at $1470. This would come into play if we get a big drop.

Este último cenário negativo é também equacionado na análise de Chris Kimble, com base no seguinte gráfico, que ilustra o "padrão Torre Eiffel":





Citação de: Chris Kimble | Sep 15, 2017
When it comes to popular delusions and charts, the "Eiffel Tower Pattern" can be important to recognize. The point of the Eiffel Tower Pattern is this… if you see the left side of the Eiffel tower in a chart, odds favor you will see the right side of the tower as well, somewhere down the line! (…)
Potential "Eiffel Tower Pattern" could be in play for Bitcoin. If investors experience the left side of the Eiffel Tower Pattern, it is possible to experience the right side as well. (…)
An important test of support is taking place this morning at the 3,000-3,100 zone! Important for Bitcoin bulls that this support holds!

Bitcoin − Potential "Eiffel Tower" pattern

Bem, para já o suporte aguentou… e a BTC voou! :)

Counter Retail Trader

  • Visitante
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1083 em: 2017-09-16 14:52:32 »
nao sabia que havia um padrao Torre Eifel , sera que ha cristo rei ?  ;D


Local , quem validar registar , é diferente  . o Cem parece misturar tudo.

Counter Retail Trader

  • Visitante
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1084 em: 2017-09-16 22:59:45 »
http://webitcoin.com.br/chase-bank-compra-bitcoin-apos-ceo-afirmar-ser-uma-fraude-set-16/

Chase Bank compra bitcoin após CEO afirmar ser uma “fraude”

O CEO do Chase Bank, Jamie Dimon, rejeitou recentemente o Bitcoin como uma “fraude”, provavelmente causando vendas adicionais após a divulgação da notícia da Exchange chinesa. O guru financeiro comentou que Bitcoin estava em uma bolha que não era diferente da famosa Tulip bubble durante o século XVII.

No entanto, em uma jogada bastante surpreendente, JP Morgan comprou um grande bloco de Bitcoins logo após as duras críticas do CEO, de acordo com um observador cuidadoso no Twitter

O usuário ‘I am Nomad’ postou o tweet, incluindo uma captura de tela do gráfico BTC com a compra JP Morgan Chase circulada. Houve alguns comentários por parte da indústria de que os bancos têm interesse em ver o Bitcoin falhar, mesmo quando eles estão buscando se juntar ao aumento dos lucros potenciais. Chase Bank não é diferente, aparentemente, com base na informação que recentemente surgiu. A crescente aceitação financeira geral da criptomoeda, incluindo o aumento generalizado de hedge funds e investidores institucionais, indicaria que as previsões de Jamie Dimon podem não ser sólidas.


Incognitus

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 30961
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1085 em: 2017-09-17 15:49:50 »
O JP Morgan transacciona sequer Bitcoin? Não é de meter fé nenhuma nisso - até porque as transacções em Bitcoin são anónimas. E a esmagadora maioria de compras de activos atribuídas a grandes bancos são-no em nome de clientes (se bem que lá está, nem faz à partida sentido a JP Morgan transaccionar Bitcoin, ou ser identificada a fazê-lo).

Por fim, qualquer string identificativa seja do que for pode ser spoofed, ou seja, podem meter lá o que quiserem. Tanto a JP Morgan não se identificaria, como outra pessoa qualquer poderia identificar a JP Morgan sem o ser.
« Última modificação: 2017-09-17 15:51:38 por Incognitus »
"Nem tudo o que pode ser contado conta, e nem tudo o que conta pode ser contado.", Albert Einstein

Incognitus, www.thinkfn.com

Counter Retail Trader

  • Visitante
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1086 em: 2017-09-17 18:28:25 »
O JP Morgan transacciona sequer Bitcoin? Não é de meter fé nenhuma nisso - até porque as transacções em Bitcoin são anónimas. E a esmagadora maioria de compras de activos atribuídas a grandes bancos são-no em nome de clientes (se bem que lá está, nem faz à partida sentido a JP Morgan transaccionar Bitcoin, ou ser identificada a fazê-lo).

Por fim, qualquer string identificativa seja do que for pode ser spoofed, ou seja, podem meter lá o que quiserem. Tanto a JP Morgan não se identificaria, como outra pessoa qualquer poderia identificar a JP Morgan sem o ser.



Incognitus

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 30961
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1087 em: 2017-09-17 18:37:55 »
O JP Morgan transacciona sequer Bitcoin? Não é de meter fé nenhuma nisso - até porque as transacções em Bitcoin são anónimas. E a esmagadora maioria de compras de activos atribuídas a grandes bancos são-no em nome de clientes (se bem que lá está, nem faz à partida sentido a JP Morgan transaccionar Bitcoin, ou ser identificada a fazê-lo).

Por fim, qualquer string identificativa seja do que for pode ser spoofed, ou seja, podem meter lá o que quiserem. Tanto a JP Morgan não se identificaria, como outra pessoa qualquer poderia identificar a JP Morgan sem o ser.





Não deves ter compreendido o que escrevi. Resumidamente:
* A JP Morgan provavelmente não transacciona Bitcoins de todo.
* Mesmo que a JP Morgan transaccionasse Bitcoins, esmagadoramente estaria a fazê-lo por conta de clientes.
* As transacções em Bitcoin são anónimas.
* Existindo um campo de texto que pode ser preenchido, a JP Morgan poderia preenchê-lo com outra coisa qualquer.
* Existindo um campo de texto que pode ser preenchido, outra pessoa qualquer poderia preenchê-lo com "JP Morgan".
* O próprio método para apresentar a informação do teu printscreen pode ser falaccioso.

Conclusão: É esmagadoramente improvável que a JP Morgan tenha comprado Bitcoin para conta própria.

----

Adicionalmente, os outros nomes apresentados também são suspeitos, bem como a ausência de players óbvios em transacções de bitcoin como mining pools, Bitpay, etc.
« Última modificação: 2017-09-17 18:40:51 por Incognitus »
"Nem tudo o que pode ser contado conta, e nem tudo o que conta pode ser contado.", Albert Einstein

Incognitus, www.thinkfn.com

Counter Retail Trader

  • Visitante
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1088 em: 2017-09-17 19:38:44 »
nao sei , nao tenho a certeza , prefiro assim do que daqui a pouco estar a mudar de opiniao , percebes?

https://fossbytes.com/the-pirate-bay-cpu-mine-cryptocurrency/

The Pirate Bay Uses Your CPU Power To Mine Cryptocurrency

any top torrent websites add an option to donate them via bitcoins. They also provide .onion address to help you access them via dark web. In a first, The Pirate Bay torrent has been found to be using a cryptocurrency miner.
It was found that the JavaScript code in the website uses your processor to mine Monero digital coins. According to a report by TorrentFreak, The Pirate Tested this feature for about 24 hours as a way to earn revenue.

“The miner does indeed appear to increase CPU usage quite a bit. It is throttled at different rates (we’ve seen both 0.6 and 0.8), but the increase in resources is immediately noticeable,” the report adds.

The website has been using a miner from Coinhive and the code was embedded in website’s footer. This code was spotted when many The Pirate Bay users noticed a spike in their CPU usage.

It was also noticed that the Monero cryptocurrency miner wasn’t enabled. Instead, it only appeared in category listings and search results; it didn’t appear on the homepage or individual torrent download page.

As it was spotted as an experiment, we can’t predict the future of this initiative. There is also a possibility that The Pirate Bay can replace the ads with some cryptominer.

Counter Retail Trader

  • Visitante
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1089 em: 2017-09-17 20:23:11 »
O JP Morgan transacciona sequer Bitcoin? Não é de meter fé nenhuma nisso - até porque as transacções em Bitcoin são anónimas. E a esmagadora maioria de compras de activos atribuídas a grandes bancos são-no em nome de clientes (se bem que lá está, nem faz à partida sentido a JP Morgan transaccionar Bitcoin, ou ser identificada a fazê-lo).

Por fim, qualquer string identificativa seja do que for pode ser spoofed, ou seja, podem meter lá o que quiserem. Tanto a JP Morgan não se identificaria, como outra pessoa qualquer poderia identificar a JP Morgan sem o ser.





Não deves ter compreendido o que escrevi. Resumidamente:
* A JP Morgan provavelmente não transacciona Bitcoins de todo.
* Mesmo que a JP Morgan transaccionasse Bitcoins, esmagadoramente estaria a fazê-lo por conta de clientes.
* As transacções em Bitcoin são anónimas.
* Existindo um campo de texto que pode ser preenchido, a JP Morgan poderia preenchê-lo com outra coisa qualquer.
* Existindo um campo de texto que pode ser preenchido, outra pessoa qualquer poderia preenchê-lo com "JP Morgan".
* O próprio método para apresentar a informação do teu printscreen pode ser falaccioso.

Conclusão: É esmagadoramente improvável que a JP Morgan tenha comprado Bitcoin para conta própria.

----

Adicionalmente, os outros nomes apresentados também são suspeitos, bem como a ausência de players óbvios em transacções de bitcoin como mining pools, Bitpay, etc.




https://twitter.com/IamNomad/status/908831764457672709/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fethereumworldnews.com%2Fjp-morgan-bank-buys-bitcoin-ceo-insults%2F

JPMorgan bought notes on that cryptocurrency on a Swedish exchange

Incognitus

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 30961
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1090 em: 2017-09-19 14:39:29 »
Isso explica os nomes referidos. Não se trata de comprar Bitcoin mas sim um instrumento que varia com Bitcoin.

Aqui aplica-se o seguinte:
* Mesmo que a JP Morgan transaccionasse Bitcoins (neste caso um instrumento), esmagadoramente estaria a fazê-lo por conta de clientes.

É o mesmo que estar a dizer-se que a IB comprou este ou aquele papel ... na realidade, terão sido clientes, através da IB.
"Nem tudo o que pode ser contado conta, e nem tudo o que conta pode ser contado.", Albert Einstein

Incognitus, www.thinkfn.com

Blaster

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 1649
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1091 em: 2017-09-19 22:46:33 »
Inc, ja viste o que o pirate bay fez?

http://www.zdnet.com/article/pirate-bay-uses-your-pc-to-mine-cryptocurrency-in-quest-to-become-ad-free/

O que achas? Eu por exemplo não me importava de disponibilizar cpu.

Se um site tipo YouTube com milhões de visitas inckui-se esta funcionalidade, deveria fazer bom dinheiro.
Na economia tudo se compra.
A Good Year.

Incognitus

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 30961
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1092 em: 2017-09-19 23:42:37 »
Inc, ja viste o que o pirate bay fez?

http://www.zdnet.com/article/pirate-bay-uses-your-pc-to-mine-cryptocurrency-in-quest-to-become-ad-free/

O que achas? Eu por exemplo não me importava de disponibilizar cpu.

Se um site tipo YouTube com milhões de visitas inckui-se esta funcionalidade, deveria fazer bom dinheiro.


CPU ou GPU, acabar-se-ia a gastar mais electricidade e a ter pior performance para o resto em que se usa o computador.
"Nem tudo o que pode ser contado conta, e nem tudo o que conta pode ser contado.", Albert Einstein

Incognitus, www.thinkfn.com

Counter Retail Trader

  • Visitante
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1093 em: 2017-09-20 08:38:38 »
terias possivelmente  uma esperança curta no tempo de vida .

Imagina que os teus componentes ja tem algum uso , e frequentas o pirate bay com frequencia, nao sei se o excesso ou o acrescimo  pela mineraçao deles nao seria o suficiente para pifar a tua grafica ou retardar/avariar o teu cpu

deMelo

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 12687
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1094 em: 2017-09-20 10:13:58 »
Usando CPU... uma bitcoin pode demorar 300 anos.

Claro que 300 pcs, passam a demorar 1 ano... provavelmente. Não é uma regra 3 simples.

Com GPU, pode-se reduzir isso para 3 anos.

Quem ainda faz cash em bitcoins está muito mais à frente. Esqueçam os PCs de casa.
The Market is Rigged. Always.

Incognitus

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 30961
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1095 em: 2017-09-20 11:26:33 »
Usando CPU... uma bitcoin pode demorar 300 anos.

Claro que 300 pcs, passam a demorar 1 ano... provavelmente. Não é uma regra 3 simples.

Com GPU, pode-se reduzir isso para 3 anos.

Quem ainda faz cash em bitcoins está muito mais à frente. Esqueçam os PCs de casa.

Exacto. Aliás, eu já escrevi sobre isto há QUATRO anos ...

Bitcoin Is An Amazing Show Of Capitalism Strength
https://seekingalpha.com/instablog/1006811-paulo-santos/1734101-bitcoin-is-an-amazing-show-of-capitalism-strength
"Nem tudo o que pode ser contado conta, e nem tudo o que conta pode ser contado.", Albert Einstein

Incognitus, www.thinkfn.com

deMelo

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 12687
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1096 em: 2017-09-20 11:29:54 »
Yep, Inc, as datas coincidem. É para aí desde 2012/2013 que a blockchain está já num nivel que um CPU caseiro já nada consegue fazer.
The Market is Rigged. Always.

Counter Retail Trader

  • Visitante
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1097 em: 2017-09-20 21:57:37 »
If I'd Known What We Were Starting
Publicado em Publicado em20 de setembro de 2017
Ray Dillinger
Ray Dillinger
 Seguir Seguir Ray Dillinger
 Gostei   315  Comentar  32   93
 Escreva um artigo
In November of 2008, I did a code review and security audit for the block chain portion of the Bitcoin source code. The late Hal Finney did code review and audit for the scripting language, and we both looked at the accounting code. Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous architect and author of the code, alternated between answering questions and asking them.

Much later, I released the archive of code that I had reviewed. However, it's not the complete sources for that version, and it looks like Hal never released his.

There was a specific reason why I was interested in the block chain code. In May of 1995, as a research paper in a graduate networking class, I had created what I believe is the first digital-cash protocol ever to use block chains in any form - though it used them in a way very different than Bitcoin and its descendants. In that protocol each 'coin' had its own little chain that grew by one link each time it was transferred from one owner to the next. Seeing the idea come around again, in a very different form, was fascinating for me.

For whatever it's worth, I found Satoshi's cryptographic code tight, and had two main critiques of the protocol. First, for as long as the network was too small there was a likelihood that an early attack by some troll with a powerful network could take over the chain and roll it back, so it was necessary to spend significant compute power making sure the chain was secured for as long as such an attack was possible. Satoshi hashed like crazy at the beginning, and that didn't happen. Second, if the network grew too big, I worried about scale and bandwidth. That one I'm actually still worried about.

But I reviewed Bitcoin the same way my professor had reviewed my academic paper, without any genuine expectation that it was going to mean anything to any large number of people but in the hopes that it would incrementally advance knowledge and awareness of the issues involved. A few weeks later Satoshi, with Hal's help, actually launched it, and they set about recruiting more people for long-term support of the project, and I stepped aside.

There were several reasons why. The main one though, is that I've been interested in digital cash protocols since before 1995. I was more aware than anyone (except maybe Satoshi and Hal) that literally scores of digital-cash systems had attempted to launch before then. And the road to progress, as Chuck Yeager observed, is marked by great smoking holes in the ground. The fact that you have probably never heard of any of those scores of launches should tell you how successful they were. I saw no reason to expect a nonzero valuation.

In fact, if you go searching in the news archives for those early launches now, you'll probably only find about twenty of them. They'll be those like E-gold that wound up in criminal court and thus, in the news, and those whose failures brought about or resulted from the end of a business, such as digicash and the Mark Twain Bank.

Most of the people involved in early digital-cash systems who had done outright criminal things and went to jail, had done them by abusing their position of being Trusted.

In security contexts - and especially in cryptography - Trusted is an epithet. In fact it's almost an obscenity. Trusted means something or someone has the power to break your security by acting in bad faith. Every Trusted role is, by definition, a weakness in security. You can see why security professionals are aghast when people talk about "Trusted Computing Modules" becoming a standard part of computers.

Good security means trying to limit the damage a Trusted role can do, even if you can't completely eliminate the Trusted role. And up until that point, limiting the damage had been the best that any digital-cash system had been able to do. But Satoshi had developed, as far as I'm aware, the first digital cash system with no Trusted role at all and thus, no way to abuse a Trusted position.

And the Trustless nature of Bitcoin was the main thing that convinced me Satoshi wasn't scamming. He built a highway with no toll bridge. People could use Bitcoin without creating any obligation to pay him anything ever. He wasn't selling coins, he was giving them away for solving hashes. He reserved nothing for himself.

He wasn't trying to line his own pockets at the expense of others. In fact I don't think I've ever encountered someone so completely uninterested in personal wealth. You know the old saw about being able to get a lot done if you don't care who gets the credit? Satoshi doesn't want the credit. Two years later he walked away and left the pseudonym behind. And hard as this may be to believe, it looks like he doesn't even want to be paid for it. As far as we can tell he mined approximately a million Bitcoins and has never sold a single one of them.

The first anonymous multibillionaire is being absolutely hardcore about demonstrating to the world that he is not ripping anybody off. He is not even using his privileged early-miner position for personal gain. Just stop and think about that for a minute, before you go on.

Once Bitcoin became successful, there were copycats. More than three thousand short-lived cryptocurrencies using the same protocol have been launched. At this date most are no longer extant. For a while I tried to keep track of them as they passed, and tried to record at least a few words about how and why each one failed. But I couldn't keep up, and besides, it was too depressing.

The standard of behavior that installs no toll booths and no Trusted roles - leaving the creator with the same opportunity to mine coins as anyone else - is seldom seen among altcoin creators. The standard of behavior set by Satoshi - not even taking any personal wealth from his creation - has not appeared again as far as I know.

Sadly, many of the people who launched these alternates don't know what they're doing. Even more sadly, most of them do know what they're doing, and at least three quarters know that what they're doing is ripping people off. They strive to do it as well as they possibly can, usually by means that I can't really distinguish from blatant stock price manipulation and insider trading.

They have created code with Trusted roles intended specifically to make the kind of toll bridges that Satoshi convinced me he wasn't a scammer by leaving out. They've even taken to selling all the coins, just like e-gold or a bunch of other digital-cash launches from previous decades that wound up with people going to jail - except now they're calling them ICO's.

New language, same game.

What ticks me off about this, is that somewhere in the middle of all these scammers and flakes, there are some genuinely good ideas that are going to get caught in the fire and burned when the whole thing comes apart with scandals and prosecutions and so on.

What else ticks me off about this, is that there is absolutely nothing wrong with issuing stock in your company as tokens on a block chain instead of through brokers on a standard exchange. Just do it legally, for Pete's sake! Go to the SEC, or whoever the appropriate regulatory authority in your jurisdiction is, and get authorization to issue stock! Hire somebody to implement shareholder voting as block chain transactions. If the law in your area doesn't allow anonymous stockholders, then you need identified participants (and, inevitably, a Trusted system to assign or match IDs). It can work. It has advantages even. But after the meltdown that the scammers are bringing down on this whole form, it's going to be anathema, or even illegal.

Most of the people doing ICO's don't have real business plans. They're not explaining that they're going to make money by providing a service or selling a product at a profit. Instead, they're telling me how they plan to promote their coins.

Let's think about that for a minute. Would you buy stock in a business whose business plan was a giant marketing campaign to promote the value of the stock? If they create nothing of value and spend money from sale of stock for their promotion (and other) expenses, then there is no business model. With no other income, remaining in business will always require further rounds of funding which will always continue to dilute the value of any stock you hold. That isn't a real business plan. I would advise against buying it.

Investors are accustomed to being protected by regulatory authorities, and "due diligence" for many of them is perfunctory at best. This attitude is not at all appropriate for block chain technologies right now. In many jurisdictions, the relationship between the law and people doing things with block chain technology is characterized by ignorance, hostility, instability, or misunderstanding. Protection of investors by regulatory authorities may not exist. These conditions can undermine the value of legitimate investments as well.

Learn where in the world the company is and where the principals are located. Learn what regulatory authorities ought to have jurisdiction. Find out whether those authorities recognize block chain technology as part of their remit, and make sure they're aware of the thing you're considering buying into. Make sure that the people involved are who they say they are (no, I'm not kidding!) and that you have legal recourse if they fail to perform. Make sure they have the appropriate business licenses, incorporation papers, authority to issue stock (yes, that's what the coins on the block chain legally are, if they're selling them at launch), and so on. If that much comes up rosy, then you're at least dealing with real businesspeople. And if you're dealing with real businesspeople, then you can ask for the business plan and do what you usually think of as due diligence.

Satoshi held - and is holding, I suppose - himself to a nearly inhuman standard of behavior in terms of refusing to give any remotest hint of possibly scamming anybody. I'm glad to have had the chance to work with him and Hal on what became a very significant project. I believe that block chain technology, once the current state of confusion is over, will contribute vastly more to the world than all the scams put together have taken or destroyed.

But good lord, what we started. I hate to even imagine how many billions of dollars of scams and failures and thefts have been perpetrated by abusing people's faith in and enthusiasm for that technology by now. And I have no idea how we could possibly have prevented it.

Counter Retail Trader

  • Visitante
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1098 em: 2017-09-21 14:02:21 »
“As bitcoin creates financial chaos, it could further jeopardize the stability of macro economy.”

– Li Yang, Director General of the National Institution of Finance and Development (central banker)

China is at war with the cryptocurrency markets:

China central bank announced a limited ban on Initial Coin Offerings (ICO) in order to establish a regulatory authority to intermediate all digital currency.
Coins experienced losses ranging from 20% to 98%.

All of China’s crypto exchanges were forced to shutdown domestic trading, removing a large majority of cryptocurrency traders.
According to reports, all exchanges that deal with cryptocurrencies in China must shut down operations to stay compliant with the country’s regulators.

Bitcoin went from $4900 down to $3200 within days. (JP Morgan bought back the dip)

The Chinese central bank is openly establishing itself as an intermediary in the cryptocurrency market – and all blockchain technology moving forward.

“The transparency of economic activities in every corner in the country will significantly improve,” OKCoin’s Duan told Bloomberg. “The central bank will have unprecedented knowledge of how the economy runs.”

Now Chinese media is reporting that executives of crypto exchanges have been ordered to not leave the country:
Chinese regulators have also asked executives and major shareholders of the trading sites to assist with further investigations, with some have been advised to “stay in Beijing to help ensure the orderly cleanups [of the system] ” by investors, according to a report carried by Beijing News on Monday, citing source familiar with the matter.

What investigations? Cleanups of the system?

I cannot find anything on investigations, but I’m sure in the near future you will hear of bitcoin confiscations. Miners will lose everything.

I do have a theory behind ‘cleanups of the system’.

What China has done is alienated itself from the cryptocurrency market. A move like this implies a crypto crash may be imminent and they are preparing for it.

Beijing just completed a 2,000 km long quantum network.

China also this month announced a yuan based – gold backed crude oil futures contract, thus making the U.S. dollar no longer needed.

The rumors are true, they have all of the gold. China also owns most of the world’s debt.

They are in perfect position to be the next world bank.

The U.S. dollar is a ‘petrol’ dollar. The United States forces the world to purchase oil for U.S. dollars. Any country who refuses brings about the wrath of U.S. democratization.

Now it is no longer necessary.

Related imageDays later oil rich Venezuela decides it will no longer accept U.S. dollars. Guess what they will accept …

The Rothschild’s, who run an investment portfolio that has returned roughly 2,000% since its inception, have begun dumping massive amounts of U.S. assets.

“We have a particular interest in investments which will benefit from the impact of new technologies, and Far Eastern markets, influenced by the growing demand from Asian consumers.”

China has seized control over the cryptocurrency market within their country and set up the U.S. dollar for collapse.

They have a quantum ground-satellite network up and running that will become a supernode in the blockchain moving forward – thus cleaning up the system.

Image result for china quantum networkThey will replace the internet with a blockchain version that runs through this node.

The People’s Bank of China (central bank) has been developing its own digital blockchain platform.

Known as ACChain, it can digitize any physical asset into currency, such as gold … or its new oil futures contracts.

The world will become digitized.

“You will be the citizen (peerage) of digital kingdom after obtained the ‘registration chain’.” – DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization)
NEO Will Be Their Currency of Choice

As of now, it is considered to be one of the best projects in the cryptoworld.
NEO has received a patent for cross-chain distributed interoperability. Translation: supernode.
Da Hongfei of NEO invited to blockchain conference held by Chinese Government, in which they laid out a plan to standardize and regulate the blockchain market.
They included NEO for a reason.

deMelo

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 12687
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Bitcoin - Tópico principal
« Responder #1099 em: 2017-09-21 17:09:06 »
Neo, as in... Matrix?

The Market is Rigged. Always.