Olá, Visitante. Por favor entre ou registe-se se ainda não for membro.

Entrar com nome de utilizador, password e duração da sessão
 

Autor Tópico: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal  (Lida 299254 vezes)

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1760 em: 2023-09-12 16:09:33 »
Um pequeno aumento da produção:


«OPEC’s Production Rises In August

By Julianne Geiger - Sep 12, 2023, 9:30 AM CDT


OPEC’s crude oil production climbed to 27.45 million barrels per day in August, according to the group’s latest Monthly Oil Market Report (MOMR) published on Tuesday.

A gain of an average of 113,000 bpd was recorded for OPEC’s August output, led primarily by Iran and Nigeria—both exempt from the production quotas. Saudi Arabia’s production declined as expected, by 88,000 bpd to 8.967 million bpd. Production declines were also seen from Algeria, Angola, Congo, and Venezuela.

Venezuela’s production fell by 42,000 bpd, to 730,000 bpd.

Iran’s oil production increase to 3 million bpd comes despite U.S. sanctions, which analysts see as not being strictly enforced as the United States seeks to improve relations between the two countries as U.S. President Joe Biden continues to battle high gasoline prices at the pump. The Administration has denied that it is not enforcing sanctions against Iran.

Iran continues to heavily discount its crude oil to China, analysts have said.

Nigeria’s August production was 98,000 bpd higher than July’s production figure, although July’s production figure was under June’s. Nigeria’s June production was 1.320 million bpd—higher than August’s 1.269 million bpd.

Angola’s production fell by 60,000 bpd to 1.115 million bpd, while Algeria’s fell 26,000 to 933,000 bpd.

By percentages, the largest production decline was seen by Congo at 6%, which saw its production fall from 270,000 bpd to 255,000 bpd. The largest percentage production hike came from Gabon at 11%, going from 204,000 bpd in July to 215,000 bpd in August. Saudi Arabia’s decrease represented a decline of 1%.

OPEC’s share of the total global production increased in August by 0.1%, standing at 27.2%. 

OPEC estimates that total non-OPEC liquids production, including OPEC NGLs, fell by 100,000 bpd in August to 73.3 million bpd—2.3 million bpd higher year over year.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/OPECs-Production-Rises-In-August.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1761 em: 2023-09-13 13:52:43 »
Recentemente, os preços têm vindo a subir um pouco:


«IEA: OPEC+ Production Cuts To Send Oil Prices And Volatility Surging

By Tsvetana Paraskova - Sep 13, 2023, 7:18 AM CDT


    Oil price volatility is expected to surge as a result of the recent OPEC+ supply cuts, the International Energy Agency said on Wednesday.
    According to the Agency, the loss of OPEC+ supply from September onwards will drive a significant supply shortfall.
    If Saudi Arabia and Russia then unwind cuts next year, the market would shift to a surplus but oil stocks would remain low leaving.

Join Our Community
OPEC

Oil prices are set for a surge in volatility amid an expected “significant supply shortfall” on the market in the fourth quarter of 2023, due to the Saudi-led cuts to OPEC+ oil supply, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said on Wednesday.   

So far this year, higher crude oil production from countries outside the OPEC+ alliance has managed to offset part of the OPEC+ cuts. 

“But from September onwards, the loss of OPEC+ production, led by Saudi Arabia, will drive a significant supply shortfall through the fourth quarter,” the IEA said today in its closely-watched Oil Market Report for September.

Last week, Saudi Arabia and Russia extended their production and export cuts of 1 million barrels per day (bpd) and 300,000 bpd, respectively, until the end of 2023, pushing Brent Crude prices to above $90 per barrel and the highest level in 10 months.

Oil prices traded in relative calm during August, with volatility at multi-year lows, the IEA said today. But a calm August was followed by the announcements of extensions of the supply cuts in early September, which sent prices and volatility higher.

Volatility could further increase through the end of this year, according to the agency.

If the two OPEC+ leaders unwind the cuts in early 2024, the market would shift to a surplus, the IEA said, but noted that oil stocks would still be at uncomfortably low levels. This increases “the risk of another surge in volatility that would be in the interest of neither producers nor consumers, given the fragile economic environment,” the Paris-based agency added.

“The Saudi-Russian alliance is proving a formidable challenge for oil markets,” it said, commenting on the move higher in oil prices and on its previous warnings about an already tightening oil market.

In August, observed global inventories plunged by a massive 76.3 million barrels, or by 2.46 million bpd, per the IEA estimates. 

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/IEA-OPEC-Production-Cuts-To-Send-Oil-Prices-And-Volatility-Surging.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1762 em: 2023-09-13 13:53:44 »
E ainda:


«The Oil Market Hasn’t Felt The Full Impact Of Saudi Arabia's Cuts Yet

By Tsvetana Paraskova - Sep 08, 2023, 7:21 AM CDT


    The market is yet to see the full impact of Saudi Arabia’s production cuts, and oil prices could go far beyond $100 if its output remains low.
    Saudi Arabia has pledged to extend its 1 million bpd production cut through December, a move that would tighten markets dramatically.
    While Russia appears to be falling short of its pledge to cut exports, strong demand indicators suggest the market is set to tighten.

Join Our Community
oil

The market hasn’t seen the full impact of Saudi Arabia’s extra production cut, which could lead to a drastically tighter market if the world’s top crude oil exporter keeps export levels low, according to Vortexa.

On Tuesday, Saudi Arabia said it would extend its 1 million bpd cut through December. The move reinforces “the precautionary efforts made by OPEC Plus countries with the aim of supporting the stability and balance of oil markets,” the Kingdom says.

Russia also extended its 300,000 bpd export cut until the end of 2023.

Saudi Arabia could be able to single-handedly tighten the market in the fourth quarter, even without the help of other OPEC+ producers, if it keeps export levels as low as it did in August, David Wech, Chief Economist at Vortexa, wrote in a note this week.

The Saudis slashed their crude and condensate exports in August by more than 1 million bpd compared to the average over 2022 and by 1.6 million bpd compared to the average over the first half of 2023, data from Vortexa showed.

Russia’s exports are also estimated to have dropped last month, but not by as much as Russia’s pledge of 500,000 bpd cut in August suggested.

Vortexa’s best guess for actual cuts in Russian exports is around 150,000 bpd.

So far, Saudi arrivals at ports of destination haven’t changed much, which could fool the market into believing the impact of the Saudi cuts isn’t that big.

“The risk is therefore that market participants discard the full impact of Saudi/OPEC+ cuts, as barrels continued to arrive for now,” Vortexa’s Wech said.

Going into the fourth quarter, “As far as we can tell, demand indicators are not looking particularly bad,” Wech added.

Globally, crude and product stocks have been drawing both onshore and offshore, thinning the cushion against a possible supply crunch.

t looks questionable whether Saudi Arabia can really maintain production and export levels at the lows of August throughout the end of the year, without tightening the market drastically and pushing prices far beyond the $100/b threshold,” Wech noted.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-Oil-Market-Hasnt-Felt-The-Full-Impact-Of-Saudi-Arabias-Cuts-Yet.html
« Última modificação: 2023-09-13 13:54:00 por Kaspov »
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

vbm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13830
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1763 em: 2023-09-13 18:54:42 »
[  ]
German Government Sees Nuclear as ’Dead Horse’.
German chancellor Olaf Scholz stated the European country
will not reopen its nuclear debate, calling nuclear a ’dead horse’ in Germany,
just as its government is striving to cap electricity prices for industry by means of state subsidies.

[  ]

«We all suffer the consequences of living in a society guided by lies and propaganda.» (Mises Institute)

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1764 em: 2023-09-13 19:44:30 »
[  ]
German Government Sees Nuclear as ’Dead Horse’.
German chancellor Olaf Scholz stated the European country
will not reopen its nuclear debate, calling nuclear a ’dead horse’ in Germany,
just as its government is striving to cap electricity prices for industry by means of state subsidies.

[  ]

«We all suffer the consequences of living in a society guided by lies and propaganda.» (Mises Institute)


Pois, é bem verdade...   :(
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1765 em: 2023-09-14 13:37:31 »
“It is an extremely risky and impractical narrative to dismiss fossil fuels, or to suggest that they are at the beginning of their end.”


«OPEC Slams The IEA Over Peak Fossil Fuel Demand Claims

By Charles Kennedy - Sep 14, 2023, 7:34 AM CDT


Consistent data-based forecasts show that peak oil and other fossil fuel demand will not happen before 2030, as the International Energy Agency (IEA) claimed earlier this week, OPEC said on Thursday, dismissing the claims of the “beginning of the end of fossil fuels.”


Demand for oil, natural gas, and coal is nearing its peak, the head of the International Energy Agency said in an op-ed for the Financial Times on Tuesday, citing IEA research.

Noting that demand for oil and gas has been growing despite forecasts of peaks, Fatih Birol went on to say that “according to new projections from the International Energy Agency, this age of seemingly relentless growth is set to come to an end this decade, bringing with it significant implications for the global energy sector and the fight against climate change.”

The research, to be released in the IEA’s World Energy Outlook in October, suggests that even if governments do nothing more than they are already doing to curb the consumption of hydrocarbons, demand for all three of them will reach a peak within the next few years, Birol said.

In a rare rebuke to energy forecasters, OPEC issued a strong-worded statement on Thursday, saying that “It is an extremely risky and impractical narrative to dismiss fossil fuels, or to suggest that they are at the beginning of their end.”

“In past decades, there were often calls of peak supply, and in more recent ones, peak demand, but evidently neither has materialized. The difference today, and what makes such predictions so dangerous, is that they are often accompanied by calls to stop investing in new oil and gas projects,” the cartel said.

OPEC Secretary General Haitham Al Ghais also commented on the IEA’s projections and claims, noting that “Such narratives only set the global energy system up to fail spectacularly. It would lead to energy chaos on a potentially unprecedented scale, with dire consequences for economies and billions of people across the world.”

OPEC and its biggest members including Saudi Arabia have been warning for years that a rushed energy transition without security of conventional supply, and the underinvestment in the oil and gas industry, would lead to chaos and shortages of supply.

In response to the IEA’s claims today, OPEC also said, referring to how net zero policies would impact people’s lives,

“How much will they cost in their current form? What benefits will they bring? Will they work as hyped? Are there other options to help reduce emissions? And what will happen if these forecasts, policies and targets do not materialize?”»


https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/OPEC-Slams-The-IEA-Over-Peak-Fossil-Fuel-Demand-Claims.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1766 em: 2023-09-15 02:58:37 »
Os $90 já foram ultrapassados:


«Oil Price Rally Sees WTI Top $90

By Charles Kennedy - Sep 14, 2023, 10:30 AM CDT


West Texas Intermediate (WTI) soared past $90 in Thursday morning trading, up over 30% in three months, driven by sustained OPEC+ production cuts and indications that a tighter market is coming.


At 10:51 a.m. ET on Wednesday, WTI was trading at $90.14, up $1.62 on the day for a gain of 1.83%.

WTI’s flirtation with the $90 mark comes a day after the International Energy Agency (IEA) warned that Saudi-led OPEC+ production cuts would create a “significant supply shortfall” that would send oil prices surging amid high volatility.

More specifically, the IEA said that from this month on, OPEC+ production cuts would “drive a significant supply shortfall through the fourth quarter”.

The IEA’s forecast follows last week’s extension of production and export cuts of 1 million barrels per day by Saudi Arabia, in addition to 300,000 bpd from Russia. The cuts were extended through December this year “with the aim of supporting the stability and balance of oil markets”.

OPEC also released its monthly report this week, indicating that fourth-quarter supplies could be tighter than previously thought.

The emerging tight supply situation has also pushed Brent crude prices to over $93 per barrel. At 10:52 a.m. ET on Wednesday, Brent was trading at $93.59, up $1.71 on the day for a 1.86% gain.

Amid mounting predictions of $100 oil in the final quarter of this year, Standard Chartered said in a report earlier this week that sharp falls in inventories caused by excess demand will continue for the remainder of the year, pushing prices higher.

Last week, Goldman Sachs said oil prices could hit $107 next year if OPEC+ failed to reverse course on production cuts.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com»


(https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/A-Critical-Mineral-Cartel-Would-Be-Worse-Than-OPEC.html)
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1767 em: 2023-09-18 04:01:23 »
"I'm going to get those gas prices down again, I promise you," the U.S. President said in a recent speech - Será que sim?   :-\


«OPEC Cuts Reignite Inflation Worries As Energy Prices Rise
By Irina Slav - Sep 17, 2023, 6:00 PM CDT

    The International Energy Agency warns of a deepening oil market deficit in the fourth quarter due to extended Saudi and Russian production cuts.
    Diesel shortages are affecting sectors such as construction, transport, and farming, with global inventories significantly below the usual levels for the year.
    Despite President Biden's promises to reduce gas prices, options like the strategic petroleum reserve are dwindling, and increasing production is not an immediate solution.

Join Our Community
OPEC

Earlier this week, the International Energy Agency warned that oil markets were in a deficit that would deepen in the fourth quarter.

The reason? Saudi and Russian cuts that were just extended until the end of the year.

The deficit may yet deepen, but it is already causing pain to energy consumers and reigniting inflation. Just when central banks thought they'd got it under control.

The latest inflation data from the United States is one recent example. A 10.6% price rise in energy drove overall inflation to an annual 3.7% in August. Core inflation rose by an annual 4.3%, prompting expectations that the Fed may reconsider its latest opinion to stop raising interest rates.

These inflation figures show how precarious any economic balance is, even in the world's largest economy, when energy markets are imbalanced. They also show that forecasts of imminent peak oil demand are better taken with a pinch of salt.

The Wall Street Journal reported this week that U.S. industries dependent on hydrocarbons are feeling the pinch from higher fuel prices. Construction, transport, and farming are all suffering because of higher fuel prices, especially diesel. Because for all the ambition that EV advocates demonstrate, electric alternatives to diesel-fueled trucks have yet to present themselves on a scale and at a price and range worth builders', freighters', and farmers' while.

With gasoline, the price jump has mostly to do with the latest rise in crude oil prices. With diesel fuel, however, the situation is grimmer. Global inventories of middle distillates, including diesel, heating oil, and gasoil, are palpably lower than they usually are at this time of the year. On top of that, there is not enough refining capacity to remedy matters. Neither is there enough sour crude.

Reuters' John Kemp reported this week that distillate fuel inventories in the United States were 16% lower than the ten-year seasonal average in August this year. That 16% translates into 23 million barrels.

In Europe, meanwhile, inventories of middle distillates were 8% lower than the ten-year average for August. That 8% translates into 35 million barrels.

The decline has been accumulating for most of the year, even though—and this is perhaps the most concerning part—industrial activity in most large consumers, including the U.S. and Europe, slowed down during the period.

Saudi Arabia's oil production cuts announced in the summer certainly aggravated the situation—the Saudis mostly cut heavier crude grades that are used to make middle distillates. So did Russian export cuts. But there was another reason why the world's middle distillate stocks are so much lower than normal: there are not enough refineries.

The problem is acute in Europe and North America, where a number of refineries were shut down during the pandemic, and others were converted to biofuel production plants. The remaining capacity appears to be sufficient for gasoline production in response to demand but not adequate for diesel fuel and other middle distillates demand.

All this means the pain that U.S. construction companies and European freight transport firms are feeling is not going to let up anytime soon. It may even worsen as heating season begins and demand for fuel oil increases.

It won't be just businesses feeling the pinch, either. The Biden administration has already demonstrated alarm about rising gasoline prices and has reached out to the oil industry to, apparently, do something about it. The industry, in the face of the American Petroleum Institute, basically responded with a flat no.

"It's clear America needs more energy production to meet historic levels of demand, but the Biden administration has instead taken every opportunity to restrict production both now and in the future," the lobby group's senior VP of Policy, Economics, and Regulatory Affairs said, as quoted by Axios.

Meanwhile, as West Texas Intermediate hit $90 per barrel on Thursday, President Biden pledged to bring prices down. The problem is, the strategic petroleum reserve is already half-empty. And that means Biden can't repeat the massive drawdown he used last year to calm prices down.

"I'm going to get those gas prices down again, I promise you," the U.S. President said in a recent speech. Yet his options are even more limited than they were last year. Then, he had a full SPR. Now, the SPR is at a 40-year low. A new series of drawdowns will not go down well with anyone.

Producers are in no way going to ramp up production fast enough. Even if they do, by some miracle, it won't be the production of sour, heavy crudes used in distillate fuel production. In other words, pain is going to extend, just like the Saudi and Russia production cuts. Unless the administration lifts all sanctions on Venezuela's PDVSA, that is. That will open up a source of heavy crude to add to shipments from Canada.

But at what cost?

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/OPEC-Cuts-Reignite-Inflation-Worries-As-Energy-Prices-Rise.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1768 em: 2023-09-18 14:10:44 »
A importância do petróleo mantém-se intacta:


«Brazil Could Drill For Oil In Environmentally Sensitive Offshore Area

By Tsvetana Paraskova - Sep 18, 2023, 7:30 AM CDT


Brazil could launch oil exploration in an environmentally sensitive deepwater basin if state oil giant Petrobras has a “cautious” approach to drilling in the area, according to Brazilian Finance Minister Fernando Haddad.

The so-called Equatorial Margin offshore Brazil including the Foz do Amazonas, Pará-Maranhão, and Barreirinhas basins, and is estimated to hold large oil and gas reserves. 

“We may need oil from the Equatorial Margin on the condition that Petrobras take environmental precautions and Petrobras is very willing to consider this,” Haddad said in a television interview on Sunday, carried by Reuters.

Earlier this year, Brazil’s environmental protection agency, Ibama, refused to grant approval for a controversial offshore oil project in the area led by Petrobras. The company was preparing to drill a well in the Foz do Amazonas area in the Equatorial Margin where the Amazon River meets the Atlantic.

The block in the Foz do Amazonas basin, off Brazil’s northern coast, is close to the mouth of the Amazon River, which prompted the environmentalist protest that eventually led to the regulator’s decision.

Petrobras has appealed the decision of the environmental protection agency.

The administration of Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva is looking to accelerate the energy transition, but it is also betting on continued development of the oil and gas industry, to pay for more incentives for green initiatives.

Despite the efforts to accelerate emissions reductions, the Brazilian administration has signaled that there isn’t a discrepancy in Brazil’s efforts to advance the energy transition and its state oil company Petrobras pursuing drilling in domestic frontier areas.

“There is no contradiction. You indicate where you want to get and then you'll need resources for that,” Lula’s chief of staff Rui Costa said in a radio interview last month carried by Reuters.

“We are going to build a sustainable, renewable energy matrix, but it's obvious that we need to fund that transition process,” Costa added.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Brazil-Could-Drill-For-Oil-In-Environmentally-Sensitive-Offshore-Area.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1769 em: 2023-09-19 02:01:52 »
Continua a tendência de subida:


«Oil Closes In On $95 Per Barrel, Hitting $100 In Some Markets

By Charles Kennedy - Sep 18, 2023, 1:30 PM CDT


The oil-price rally continued in full force on Monday, with Brent crude closing in on $95 per barrel in early afternoon trading, and some crude grades around the world topping $100.

At 12:23 p.m. ET on Monday, Brent crude was trading at $94.53, while WTI was trading at $91.81.

Elsewhere, Reuters reported that Nigerian Qua Iboe crude rallied past $100 per barrel on Monday, while Malaysian Tapis crude had already surpassed that mark last week, citing Swedish bank SEB analyst Bjarne Schieldrop as saying in a report that “Saudi Arabia and Russia are in solid control of the oil market”.

Oil is now at its highest price this year, with investors banking on tight supply and excess demand in the final quarter of the year as a result of production cut extensions by both Saudi Arabia and Russia, the two largest producers in OPEC+.

The Swedish bank analyst also predicted that Brent would rise above $100 because a rally to that point would require nothing more than “noise”.

Schieldrop said dated Brent is highly likely to move above $100 as "only noise is needed to bring it above." Swiss bank UBS sees Brent futures reaching triple digits.

Swiss UBS sees Brent trading in the $90-$100 range, targeting $95 at year-end, while Standard Chartered analysts forecast $93 per barrel, but are not ruling out a Q4 rise above $100.

CitiGroup cautioned on Monday that while geopolitics could move prices past $100 in the short-term, “$90 prices look unsustainable” and a withdrawal from the rally is expected as supply builds. Citi noted that non-OPEC supply is expected to increase by 1.8 million barrels per day this year and another 1 million bpd in 2024, with the U.S. set to add 900,000 bpd this year and 400,000 bpd next year, Bloomberg reports.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Oil-Closes-In-On-95-Per-Barrel-Hitting-100-In-Some-Markets.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

vbm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 13830
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1770 em: 2023-09-19 09:51:20 »
Lá vai o elon musk vender mais carros!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1771 em: 2023-09-19 13:55:53 »
Lá vai o elon musk vender mais carros!

Pois - acredito q sim!   :)
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1772 em: 2023-09-19 16:44:39 »
Tb temos q pagar "taxas invisíveis"...    :(


«Taxa invisível inflama preços dos combustíveis. Mas o que explica diferença entre gasóleo e gasolina?

ZAP

19 Setembro, 2023
19 Setembro, 2023
2

ZAP

O preço dos combustíveis atingiu o valor mais alto deste ano, com um aumento de seis cêntimos no gasóleo e de meio cêntimo na gasolina. Mas o que explica esta diferença? E o que contribui para estes aumentos sucessivos?

Há vários factores a contribuir para o aumento sucessivo nos preços dos combustíveis – e as subidas não vão parar.

Há toda uma conjuntura internacional que contribui para este cenário, nomeadamente a guerra na Ucrânia e as sanções à Rússia. Mas também o corte na produção de petróleo agrava os preços das matérias-primas nos mercados internacionais, o que se reflecte nos valores que os consumidores pagam na hora de abastecer.

Mas há ainda o peso dos impostos, especificamente de uma taxa “invisível” que surge incorporada no Imposto sobre Produtos Petrolíferos (ISP). Trata-se da taxa de carbono que foi criada para penalizar as emissões poluentes (CO2).


Ler também:

    Recorde de uma década nos preços dos combustíveis. Governo não mexe nos apoios
    Combustíveis sobem (outra vez). Gasolina não estava tão cara há quase um ano

Desde o início do ano, este “imposto verde” já fez subir o preço da gasolina em sete cêntimos e o preço do gasóleo em oito cêntimos, de acordo com dados da Direcção Geral de Energia e Geologia (DGEG) que são citados pelo Correio da Manhã (CM).

Os últimos dados divulgados pela DGEG respeitam a Julho e, nessa altura, dos 58 cêntimos de ISP pagos por cada litro de gasolina, mais de 12 cêntimos referiam-se à taxa de carbono. No gasóleo, dos 46 cêntimos taxados, quase 14 respeitavam ao “imposto verde”.

Esta taxa de carbono deveria ser actualizada anualmente de acordo com os preços dos leilões de licenças de emissão de gases de efeito de estufa. Mas o Governo suspendeu esse aumento, já por várias vezes, embora tenha começado o seu descongelamento gradual.

Assim, o contributo desta “taxa invisível” para o preço dos combustíveis poderia ser ainda mais pesado.
O que explica a diferença entre gasolina e gasóleo?

Nesta semana, salta à vista uma diferença evidente nos aumentos dos preços da gasolina e do gasóleo – a primeira subiu apenas meio cêntimo enquanto o segundo aumentou seis cêntimos.
PUBLICIDADE

Como se explica esta diferença? É uma questão de oferta e de procura que, por um lado, se deve ao fim do habitual período de férias nos EUA.

“A gasolina sobe sempre mais do que o gasóleo no final da Primavera e depois alivia por volta do Labor Day, que nos Estados Unidos marca o regresso ao trabalho e é a seguir ao primeiro fim de semana de Setembro”, explica ao Eco uma fonte do sector.

Se o “consumo da gasolina tem uma certa sazonalidade, com maior consumo no Verão, com o turismo e as viagens“, o mesmo “não acontece com o gasóleo”, reforça o secretário-geral da Associação Portuguesa de Empresas Petrolíferas (Apetro), António Comprido, também em declarações ao Eco.

Os preços do gasóleo estão a ser inflaccionados pelo “funcionamento deficitário do aparelho europeu de refinação de gasóleo que vinha sobretudo da Rússia”, acrescenta o dirigente da Apetro.
PUBLICIDADE

As sanções impostas à Rússia agravaram a situação, obrigando os países europeus a importarem gasóleo de outras regiões.

“Enquanto o aparelho europeu de refinação de gasóleo é deficitário o de gasolina é excedentário”, salienta ainda Comprido. Uma “situação diferente da registada em Portugal, que depois do último upgrade, passou a ser auto-suficiente em termos de refinação de gasóleo, assim como da gasolina”, explica o elemento da Apetro.

A contribuir para o aumento dos preços dos combustíveis está também a subida no preço do Brent que serve de marcador para os mercados europeus, devido à escassez da oferta depois da decisão da OPEP de cortar na produção de petróleo.
Montenegro diz que Governo “ganha muito dinheiro” com combustíveis

“Desde a primeira hora que o Governo socialista não tem sido sério na gestão do preço dos combustíveis“, acusa o líder do PSD, Luís Montenegro, criticando o Executivo por ter aumentado, “logo mal iniciou funções, em 2016”, o ISP.
PUBLICIDADE

“O Governo ganha dinheiro e ganha muito dinheiro, entre outras coisas, na parcela de IVA que actua sobre o preço do produto e sobre o preço do imposto que lhe está associado”, salienta Montenegro, frisando que o ministro das Finanças, Fernando Medina, “sabe muito bem o que é que tem a fazer”. E isso passa por “descer o ISP em função do nível de receita que está a arrecadar a mais pelo efeito do IVA”, diz.

Criticando o Governo por não ter aceite a proposta do PSD “feita o ano passado, relativamente aos combustíveis e à energia de, pelo menos transitoriamente, descer o IVA para 6%“, Montenegro pede que “ao menos que sejam sérios” e “façam aquilo que prometeram”.
Ler também:

    Recorde de uma década nos preços dos combustíveis. Governo não mexe nos apoios
    Combustíveis sobem (outra vez). Gasolina não estava tão cara há quase um ano

“É só ter um mecanismo automático, não é preciso estar a inventar sempre portarias e despachos”, considera.
IL pede menos impostos

Já o presidente da Iniciativa Liberal (IL), Rui Rocha, insiste na redução da carga fiscal no preço dos combustíveis, considerando que cada dia que passa é mais um em que os portugueses estão sujeitos a “uma provação sem nenhuma necessidade”.

“Temos uma realidade, em Portugal, que é uma parte muito significativa do preço final dos combustíveis que são impostos e isso é particularmente gravoso no momento em que as pessoas têm  muitas dificuldades“, salienta Rocha.

No sábado passado, o Governo garantiu que vai monitorizar os preços dos combustíveis, dados os recentes aumentos, prometendo “vontade de agir no sentido da protecção das famílias”, se for “absolutamente necessário”.

No domingo, o Presidente da República, Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, manifestou-se convicto de que o Governo “está atento” e a “preparar medidas ou, pelo menos, formas de mitigar a situação, porque é uma situação que está a pesar muito na inflação em Portugal e noutros países europeus”.

No início de Setembro, o Governo manteve inalterados, para este mês, os descontos no ISP em 13,1 cêntimos por litro no gasóleo e 15,3 na gasolina, e a suspensão da actualização da taxa de carbono.

Entre as medidas em vigor está o desconto no ISP equivalente a uma descida da taxa do IVA dos 23% para 13%, bem como a compensação, através do ISP, da receita adicional do IVA que resulta do aumento do preço dos combustíveis.

ZAP // Lusa»


https://zap.aeiou.pt/taxa-invisivel-precos-dos-combustiveis-557962
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1773 em: 2023-09-20 20:52:28 »
«Electric Dream On Pause? UK's Fuel Car Ban Faces Delay

By City A.M - Sep 20, 2023, 12:00 PM CDT


    Leading car manufacturers like Ford UK express frustration over the UK's potential shift from the 2030 petrol and diesel ban to 2035.
    The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) highlights the need for a strong domestic EV market and worries about consumer confusion.
    Despite the pushback from the auto industry, some see the delay as a common-sense decision, noting the high costs to everyday drivers.

Join Our Community
London

Leading car manufacturers have urged the government to give clarity on its proposed row back on banning petrol and diesel cars, saying they’ve invested hundreds of millions to meet targets.

Mike Hawes, chief executive of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), said the policy change will cause “concern” among car makers.

It has been widely reported that the ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars and vans will be pushed back from 2030 to 2035.

Mr Hawes told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that high demand for electric cars within the UK is needed if more are to be built in the country.

He said: “You want to build close to where you sell, so you need a strong market here in the UK to help secure future investment.

“The concern now is, does this cause consumers to delay their purchase?”

Home secretary Suella Braverman also went on the media rounds on Wednesday morning defending the policy, claiming “we are not going to save the planet by bankrupting Britain”, after the government rowed back its green pledges.

Meanwhile, Lisa Brankin, the chair of Ford UK issued a furious statement, as reported by Sky News.

“Three years ago the government announced the UK’s transition to electric car and van sales from 2030. The auto industry is investing to meet that challenge.”

She said Ford had committed $50bn to electrification with nine electric vehicles by 2025, including a £430m investment in Ford UK’s facilities, with more funding planned for the 2030 timeline.

She said the “biggest industry transformation in over a century and the UK 2030 target is a vital catalyst to accelerate Ford into a cleaner future.”

Lashing out at Rishi Sunak, she said “our business needs three things from the UK government: Ambition, commitment and consistency”.

“A relaxation of 2030 would undermine all three. We need the policy focus trained on bolstering the EV market in the short term and supporting consumers while headwinds are strong: Infrastructure remains immature, tariffs loom and the cost of living is high.”

BMW declined to comment, but said it and the entire industry needed clarity on the issue.

A Jaguar Land Rover spokesperson told City A.M. that it “is investing £15bn over the next five years to electrify our luxury brands, which is key to JLR reaching net zero carbon emissions across our supply chain, products, and operations by 2039. “

“Our plans are on track and we welcome certainty around legislation for the end of sale of petrol and diesel powered cars.”

SMMT figures show the private share of the market for battery electric new cars has already fallen from more than a third (36.2%) in the first half of 2022 to less than a quarter (24.2%) during the same period this year.

Demand has grown for fleet registrations, partly due to the lower company car tax for electric cars.

Mr Hawes said he was “assured” on Monday that the zero emission vehicles mandate – a requirement for manufacturers to increase the proportion of new cars and vans they sell that are zero emission – will still be introduced.

It is due to be implemented from the beginning of next year.

Mr Hawes said: “We’re trying to understand what is going to happen next between this sort of statement (on the 2030 ban) and that policy, and the message it sends consumers which must be incredibly confusing.”

Ian Plummer, commercial director at online vehicle marketplace Auto Trader, said: “Pushing back the 2030 ban on new petrol and diesel sales by five years is a hugely retrograde step which puts politics ahead of net zero goals.

“This U-turn will cause a huge headache for manufacturers, who are crying out for clarity and consistency, and it is hardly going to encourage the vast majority of drivers who are yet to buy an electric car to make the switch.

“Rather than grasp the challenge and use the tax system to ease concerns over affordability, the Prime Minister has taken the easy option with one eye on polling day.”

But Tory MP for Lincoln Karl McCartney described the Prime Minister’s reported plans as “the common sense decision”.

He said the “costs to normal drivers will be too high” if the 2030 ban was maintained.

He added: “The only people who will complain about this delay are the central London eco-zealots who do not live in the real world and are rich enough not to be affected.”

By CityAM»


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Gas-Prices/Electric-Dream-On-Pause-UKs-Fuel-Car-Ban-Faces-Delay.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1774 em: 2023-09-25 00:43:05 »
Parece estar a regressar um pouco de bom senso...


«Uranium Investors Bet Big On Nuclear Renaissance

By Alex Kimani - Sep 24, 2023, 4:00 PM CDT


    Dozens of governments and influential bodies that were formerly opposed to nuclear energy are now openly embracing and hailing it as a necessary player in the global electrification and decarbonization drive.
    Uranium markets have lately been on a roll after prices for yellowcake gained more than 20% YTD.
    Global uranium production dropped by 25% from 2016 to 2020 amid low prices before recovering slightly to 49,355 metric tons last year.

Join Our Community
Nuclear power

Uranium and the nuclear energy sector are enjoying a renaissance. There has been a palpable shift in support for nuclear power amid the transition to low-carbon fuels as well as a renewed push to enhance energy security after the global energy crisis triggered by Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Dozens of governments and influential bodies that were formerly opposed to nuclear energy are now openly embracing and hailing it as a necessary player in the global electrification and decarbonization drive. And few have been as monumental as Finland's Green Party which voted overwhelmingly in 2022 to categorize nuclear power as a form of sustainable energy after decades of strong opposition. A third of Finland's electricity is generated by nuclear power.

“I am very happy and proud. This is a historical moment in the history of the green movement, as we are the first green party in the world to officially let go of anti-nuclearism.” said Tea Törmänen, a voting member and chair of the Savonia/Karelia chapter of Viite, the pro-science internal group of the party, shortly after the vote.

Other European nations quickly followed suit with Belgium, Spain and Sweden supporting nuclear energy.

Not surprisingly, uranium markets have lately been on a roll after prices for yellowcake gained more than 20% YTD, better than any other metal and topping $65/lb for the first time in 12 years.

Uranium-based investment vehicles and ETFs have performed even better than the metal they track: Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is up 29.2% in the year-to-date; Horizons Global Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO) has returned 40.3% while VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has gained 28.5%. Uranium miners have not disappointed either: Cameco Corp. (NYSE:CCJ)+75.2%, Uranium Energy Corp. (NYSE:UEC)+40.1% and Consolidated Uranium Inc. (OTCQX:CURUF)+30.7%.

Uranium Shortage Bites

But the biggest bullish catalyst yet for uranium bulls has been supply deficits at a time when demand is surging. Global uranium production dropped by 25% from 2016 to 2020 amid low prices before recovering slightly to 49,355 metric tons last year.

The coup in Mali, which produces ~4% of the world's total, and Cameco's falling production due to difficulties at its Cigar Lake mine and Key Lake mill in Canada have also constrained supply. Global supplies remain constrained mainly due to years of under-investment in new production,  monopoly of state-owned entities, transportation risks and geopolitical uncertainties.
Related: Michael Bloomberg Pledges Another $500 Million To “Finish The Job On Coal”

Meanwhile, in its latest biennial report, the World Nuclear Association has predicted that demand for uranium used in nuclear reactors will surge 28% by 2030 and nearly double by 2040 as governments ramp up nuclear power capacity in a bid to meet zero-carbon targets.

Sachem Cove Chief Investment Officer Michael Alkin has told The Wall Street Journal that the uranium market remains “very tight’’ and prices are likely to move even higher heading into 2024. Alkins says he expects utilities to start ramping up talks for uranium conversion and enrichment through private negotiations during the fall or requests for proposals.

Cameco says the dual agendas of clean energy and energy security have so failed to translate into a stronger primary supply pipeline. According to the uranium miner, the uranium market is still in the "relatively early stages of the cycle as uncovered uranium requirements by utilities remains elevated," and only "sustained long-term uranium demand will ultimately drive the company's future production plans."

Cost and Policy Risk

Like all investment theses, uranium bulls will have to contend with some key risks. First off, over the decades, the nuclear sector has become notorious for huge cost overruns by uranium projects. Unfortunately, project managers, financial planners and financiers do not appear to be any closer to solving this conundrum in this age of AI.

Not only has the cost of building new nuclear plants sky-rocketed in recent years but plants currently under construction are massively exceeding cost estimates. A large 3,200 megawatt (MW) plant planned to be built in southwest England by France's EDF , the world's largest nuclear operator, is now estimated to cost ~$40 billion, or 30% higher than the initial estimate. Smaller projects are not immune to this problem either. NuScale Power’s 462-MW plant under construction has seen cost estimates increase from $58 per megawatt hour in 2021 to $89/MWh in 2023, a  more than 50% jump in the space of just two years.

Second, another major nuclear accident like Three Mile Island or Fukushima might rapidly sour the public sentiment and even force a policy shift. A major thorium breakthrough might spell doom for the uranium sector since thorium reactors do not carry the same risk of a catastrophic meltdown inherent in nuclear reactors powered by uranium.

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/Uranium-Investors-Bet-Big-On-Nuclear-Renaissance.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1775 em: 2023-09-25 00:51:17 »
O crude ainda poderá subir + um bocado...


«JPMorgan Analyst Sees Energy Supercycle With Oil As High As $150

By Julianne Geiger - Sep 22, 2023, 4:30 PM CDT


JPMorgan’s head of EMEA energy equity research, Christyan Malek, warned markets on Friday that the recent Brent price surge could continue upwards to $150 per barrel by 2026, according to a new research report.

Several catalysts went into the $150 price warning, including capacity shocks, an energy supercycle—and of course, efforts to push the world further away from fossil fuels.

Most recently, crude oil prices have surged on the back of OPEC+ production cuts, mostly led by Saudi Arabia who almost singlehanded took 1 million bpd out of the market, followed by a fuel export ban from Russia. Increased crude demand paired up with the supply restrictions, boosting crude oil prices and contributing to rising consumer prices.

Brent prices were trading around $93.55 on Friday afternoon, but Malek expects Brent prices between $90 and $110 next year, and even higher in 2025.

“Put your seatbelts on. It’s going to be a very volatile supercycle,” Malek told Bloomberg on Friday, as the analyst warned about OPEC’s production cuts and a lack of investment in new oil production.

JPMorgan said in February this year that Oil prices were unlikely to reach $100 per barrel this year unless there was some major geopolitical event that rattled markets, warning that OPEC+ could add in as much as 400,000 bpd to global supplies, with Russia’s oil exports potentially recovering by the middle of this year. At the time, JPMorgan was estimating 770,000 bpd in demand growth from China—less than what the IEA and OPEC were estimating.

JPMorgan now sees the global supply and demand imbalance at 1.1 million bpd in 2025, but growing to a 7.1 million bpd deficit in 2030 as robust demand continues to butt up against limited supply.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/JPMorgan-Analyst-Sees-Energy-Supercycle-With-Oil-As-High-As-150.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1776 em: 2023-09-25 00:54:11 »
Sim, finalmente...   :)


«Energy Security Trumps ESG Agenda For Big Oil

By Tsvetana Paraskova - Sep 19, 2023, 7:00 PM CDT


    Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine energy companies have put energy security higher on the agenda.
    Shell and BP said earlier this year that they would invest more in resilient oil and gas projects than previously planned.
    Big Oil hasn’t ditched net-zero ambitions, but at the same time it also isn’t taking steps to actively reduce hydrocarbon production.


Join Our Community
Offshore

The world’s largest international oil and gas majors have changed their tune on medium to long-term strategies since the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the energy crisis last year.   

All European majors continue to target net-zero emissions by 2050, but some of the biggest, including BP and Shell, have scaled back promises to cut back oil and gas production and have signaled they would be there to provide the world with fossil fuel energy as long as it needs it.

Considering that the world still depends on fossil fuels for more than 80% of its primary energy consumption, it’s not outrageous – from a business perspective – for companies with core oil and gas business to double down on continued extraction of oil and gas. They are hard pressed to reward shareholders in a cyclical industry with frequent booms and busts. But this decade Big Oil has also been hard pressed by the ESG movement from investors to commit to reducing emissions faster, including Scope 3 emissions from the products they sell.

Security Of Supply Precedes Emissions Reduction Amid Energy Crisis

Following last year’s energy crisis in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and upended global oil and gas flows, international majors have pivoted back to oil and gas production, saying that fossil fuels will continue to be critical for the energy system until it matures enough to run mostly on low-carbon energy.   

Fossil fuel consumption as a percentage of primary energy remained steady at 82% in 2022, according to the 2023 Energy Institute Statistical Review of World Energy, a closely-watched annual report previously produced by BP.

At the same time, energy-related emissions continued to rebound strongly, reaching a record high of 39.3 billion tons of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2022, or a 0.8% increase over 2021. Emissions from energy consumption contributed 87% of total global emissions, according to the review.
Related: Canada’s Inflation Accelerates As Gasoline Prices Rise

The International Energy Agency (IEA) said in its own CO2 Emissions in 2022 report in March that global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions increased by 0.9% to reach a new record high in 2022, although the pace of growth was lower than feared. Higher emissions from coal – which replaced some gas consumption due to the record gas prices last year – more than offset lower emissions from gas, while emissions from oil grew even more than emissions from coal, the IEA said.

Despite the record emissions, Big Oil defied environmentalists and ESG-minded investors by saying this year that oil and gas are too important energy sources to be easily dismissed in the energy transition.

Shell and BP said earlier this year that they would invest more in resilient oil and gas projects than previously planned and would pump more hydrocarbons for longer to meet the world’s needs.

“There is no one solution. It is critical that the world avoids dismantling the current energy system faster than we are able to build the clean energy system of the future,” Shell’s CEO Wael Sawan said on Capital Markets Day in June.

“Oil and gas WILL continue to play a crucial role in the energy system for a long time to come, with demand reducing only gradually over time. Continued investment in oil and gas is critical to ensure a balanced energy transition, because of the growing energy demand I just mentioned, as well as natural decline rates and severe underinvestment in recent years.”

Reducing global oil and gas production would be “dangerous and irresponsible” as the world still desperately needs those hydrocarbons, Sawan told the BBC a few weeks later.

Affordability Of Supply

Security, affordability, and sustainability of supply are key themes in debates as oil executives from companies, including Canada’s oil sands, Saudi Aramco, and the supermajors, are taking part in the 24th World Petroleum Congress in Calgary, Canada, this week. The main theme of the event is “Energy Transition: The Path to Net Zero.”

Big Oil hasn’t ditched net zero. But it hasn’t ditched oil and gas, either. On the contrary, recent statements from executives signal that companies would now be looking to develop more oil and gas resources with a focus on lower emissions and carefully plan their investments in low-carbon energies to create value for shareholders and not leave the world starving of conventional energy sources while it still needs them.

Affordability is also a part of the energy trilemma, and Richard Masson, chair of the World Petroleum Council in Canada and among the organizers of the event in Calgary, posed a very important question in an interview with Bloomberg,

“The question becomes, ‘How do we manage the transition without leaving people in energy poverty?”

The answer to this, according to the top oil executives this year, could be a carefully managed energy transition without “leave it in the ground” extremes or an “either-or” approach to energy investments until the world needs more oil and gas.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Energy-Security-Trumps-ESG-Agenda-For-Big-Oil.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1777 em: 2023-09-26 19:13:13 »
"2022. In that year, fossil fuels accounted for a staggering 82% of total primary energy consumption"


«Achieving Paris Climate Goals With An Altered Energy Mix By 2040

By Salman Ghouri - Sep 26, 2023, 10:00 AM CDT


    Energy is one of the driving forces behind global economic growth.
    It is important to recognize that reducing energy consumption significantly would jeopardize global economic growth.
    The world is making significant strides to decarbonize power generation and transportation before 2040.


Join Our Community
Industry

Energy stands as the cornerstone of global economic prosperity. Out of total primary energy consumption (TPEC), fossil fuels have long played a dominant role in the development of our societies, as indicated in Figure-1 for the year 2022. In that year, fossil fuels accounted for a staggering 82% of total primary energy consumption. Breaking this down, we find that oil led the way at 32%, closely followed by coal at 27%, natural gas at 23%, and hydro and renewable sources each at 7%, with nuclear bringing up the rear at 4%. While fossil fuels have indeed propelled our economic progress, they also have negative implications for the environment and human health. Going back to the 18th and 19th centuries, coal took center stage in driving global economic growth, and although its role has diminished somewhat, it still looms large behind oil.

Figure-2 illustrates the historical trends of total primary energy consumption (TPEC) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions since 1970. There is, indeed, a positive correlation between the usage of TPEC and CO2 emission; the more energy we consume, the more we will pollute our environment. However, over the years, this relationship has weakened due to improvements in energy efficiency due to technological advancements. Nevertheless, we have reached a juncture where continued reliance on fossil fuels and a reluctance to embrace renewables will leave a polluted legacy for future generations. Such a legacy, rife with detrimental consequences for the economy and environment, is not one we wish to leave behind.

It is important to recognize that reducing energy consumption significantly would jeopardize global economic growth. Thus, our challenge is to curtail the wasteful use of fossil fuels and promote clean energy sources wherever possible.

Identification of the problem:

First, to address this issue effectively, we must first pinpoint the problem. It is no secret that the major culprits are fossil fuels, particularly coal and oil. Natural gas, relatively cleaner, remains in the mix. While we cannot abruptly halt fossil fuel usage, we must explore efficient alternatives and incorporate renewable energy into our TPEC mix. Achieving this transformation is a complex task, requiring the coordinated efforts of governments, researchers, investors, energy companies, and other stakeholders.
Related: IEA: Net Zero Still Achievable If The World Slashes Fossil Fuel Demand

Coal is predominantly consumed in power generation, with some countries relying on it for over 60% of their power needs due to domestic coal reserves and limited alternative energy sources. Meanwhile, oil dominates the transport sector, accounting for over 60% of consumption. Replacing these with cleaner energy sources, where possible, holds the key to resolving our CO2 emissions problem.

Figure-1: Primary Energy Consumption by Fuels – 2022.

The history of oil is marked by its discovery in the U.S. around 1859, but its widespread production and consumption only began at the turn of the century. The invention of the internal combustion engine by Henry Ford in the early 19th century ignited the automotive industry, sparking relentless demand for oil. Ironically, today’s auto industry is challenging its once-loyal fuel source. Electric vehicles (EVs) are poised for exponential growth, driven by automakers’ realization that their survival depends on them staying ahead of the EV curve. The pace of EV adoption is surpassing that of Internal Combustion Vehicles (ICVs), bolstered by shifting consumer preferences, environmental concerns, and the proliferation of charging infrastructure.

An article titled “The Tipping Point In Global Oil Demand” predicts that by 2040, global oil demand will peak somewhere between 2025-2027. Yet another article earlier published at Oilprice.com “EV Adoption Could Spell Trouble For Oil Exporters” predicts that under the standard model, annual EV sales are projected to grow by an average of 20%, from 26.2 million in 2022 to 582 million in 2040. This projection accounts for current EV data and industry strategies, particularly in high-growth markets such as China and India. Such growth is expected to result in fuel savings of 21.42 million barrels daily (mmbd) by 2040 under the reference case scenario. In a high-growth scenario, the total number of EVs is expected to reach 937 million, yielding fuel savings of 34.46 mmbd by 2040. While oil is projected to remain the dominant primary energy source in 2040, these gains in fuel efficiency translate into significant reductions in CO2 emissions, aligning with the goals set by the Paris Agreement by 2050.

Figure-2: Historical trend of TPEC and CO2 Emission

Another important source of TPEC is coal, accounting for 27% in 2022. Figure-3 highlights the historical trends of regional coal consumption, with Asia taking the lead at 80.8% of global coal consumption by the end of 2022. This statistic speaks volumes about the geographical concentration of pollution. Figure-4 underscores this fact, showing China alone is responsible for 67.74% of total coal consumption in Asia and accounted for 54.8% of global coal consumption, with India being the second largest consumer, trailing at 12.4%. In both countries, most of the coal is used for power generation.

Figure-3: Regional coal consumption - Exajoules

Figure-4: Historical trend of coal consumption by world top two countries (Exajoules)

Figure-5 provides a snapshot of electricity generation by source, revealing that coal still commands 35% of the market in 2022. Despite a significant decline in coal consumption in regions like Europe and North America, China’s continued reliance on coal for power generation is a persistent source of CO2 emissions. In contrast, the United States has successfully transformed its economy from coal-based power generation towards lower emissions energies. In 2000, coal was the major source of power generation, accounting for 52%, natural gas 16%, nuclear was almost 20% and renewables were 9%, and the rest by others. In 2022, the share of coal tumbled down to 19.5%, while natural gas turns out to be the largest contributor in power generation, stood at 39.8%. Consequently, natural gas has been the major driver for lowering greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generation because it’s been largely replacing coal-fired power plants. Interestingly, for the first time, electricity generated from renewables surpassed coal in 2022 (EIA), 21.5% (hydro 6.2% and renewables – 15.3%) the remaining by other sources.

Figure-5: Electricity generation by source - 2022

Renewable Growth – Good News

Renewable energy sources, particularly wind and solar, are experiencing exponential growth. This positive trend holds the promise of helping the world meet its climate change goals by 2050. However, this growth is contingent on sustained investments and government policies that favor renewables. China and India, two of the world’s largest CO2 emitters, are taking substantial and connected measures to tackle the issue. Both countries are investing in renewable energy sources, transitioning from ICVs to EVs, and expanding wind and solar capacity. They’re also exploring hydro and nuclear power to diversify their energy mix. 

Our aspiration is for a shift in the TPEC mix towards renewables and clean energy sources. If the world can accomplish this transformation by 2040, as illustrated in Figure-6, the vision outlined back in 2017 by the author remains valid. The proliferation of EVs will reduce oil’s share from 32% in 2022 to 23% in 2040, while coal’s share will drop from 27% to 18% in the same period. In contrast, natural gas and renewables will see their shares grow from 23% and 7% respectively, to 28% and 18% by 2040.

Figure-6: Global Primary Energy Consumption – Mix (%)

Figures 7 to 11 provide hope that, yes, we have identified the inherent problems and are well on our way to resolving these issues of energy and pollution that have a positive correlation. Though the journey is bumpy, the end results will be thrilling. Global renewables, growth in wind power and solar energy are all growing at healthy rates. China, the largest consumer of coal and a significant contributor to pollution, is not just recognized for this issue but is actively taking substantial measures to combat CO2 pollution by investing in wind and solar energy.

Significantly, China holds the top position globally as the largest manufacturer of both wind and solar technologies. Its investments in hydroelectric and nuclear energy, coupled with its initiatives in electric vehicles (EVs), have contributed to a decrease in its reliance on oil imports and the associated CO2-related challenges.

If the world can transform its energy mix as highlighted in Figure-6 it would be better off without compromising its economic prosperity. Moreover, we can pass down a healthy and environmentally acceptable society to our future generations. Looking at United States, a successful journey from coal-based electricity generation towards natural gas and renewable energy, we are optimistic that with concerted efforts the world will be able to meet the Paris climate targets by 2050.

By Salman Ghouri and Farris Ahmad for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Achieving-Paris-Climate-Goals-With-An-Altered-Energy-Mix-By-2040.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1778 em: 2023-09-27 17:41:46 »
Hoje o crude está a subir bem...  já não falta mto para os $100  :-\


«Why Oil Stocks Are Lagging Behind Soaring Crude Oil Prices

By Alex Kimani - Sep 21, 2023, 6:00 PM CDT


    Energy stocks have been lagging the commodity they track by a significant margin.
    energy sector is currently the cheapest in the market, with the current sector PE ratio of 7.6 less than half the S&P 500’s average at 19.9.
    At a sector level in the S&P500, the Energy sector has the highest percentage of Buy ratings.

Join Our Community
Stock markets

Over the past couple of months oil markets have been on fire, with oil prices gaining 30% since June after Saudi Arabia and Russia announced they would extend their production cuts and exports. The cuts have proven to be pretty effective, with commodity analysts estimating that global markets could be currently facing a deficit of as much as 3 million barrels per day. This implies that the rally is in-line with market fundamentals, unlike the previous situation where market sentiment was extremely bearish despite early signs of tightening supply.

It’s, therefore, surprising to find that energy stocks have been lagging the commodity they track by a significant margin. The energy market’s popular benchmark, the S&P 500 energy index has only managed a 14% gain over the timeframe, while its 6.5% return in the year-to-date badly lags the S&P 500’s 15.2% gain over the timeframe.

It’s quite clear that energy investors don’t share the enthusiasm of hedge funds and speculators, which have become the most bullish in nearly two years. It’s even more perplexing when you consider the energy sector is currently the cheapest in the market, with the current sector PE ratio of 7.6 less than half the S&P 500’s average at 19.9.

To be fair, there’s a method to this madness, with Chevron Inc.’s (NYSE:CVX) latest debacle at its giant LNG plants in Australia helping to sour sentiment. CVX accounts for a chunky 17 percent of the S&P 500 energy index.

Underwhelming Earnings

But there’s a lot more to it. The latest earnings season is now almost complete, and the erstwhile high-flying oil and gas sector has left a lot to be desired. Whereas Q3 2023 earnings growth for the S&P 500 clocked in at a miniscule 0.2%, well below the 5-year average earnings growth rate of 12.0%, it actually marked the first time the market managed to post positive growth in four consecutive quarters.

In contrast, the monster earnings growth, high commodity prices and stock rally the energy sector enjoyed over the past two years set it up for some really tough comps. The sector has reported the largest earnings decline of all eleven sectors at a steep -40.1%, thanks to lower year-over-year oil prices taking a massive toll on the bottomline. Indeed, despite the recent rise in oil and gas prices, the average price of oil to date in Q3 2023 ($80.39) is still 12% below the average price for oil in Q3 2022 ($91.43).
Related: Hedge Funds Are Sold On $100 Oil

At the sub-industry level, three of the five sub-industries in the sector reported (year-over-year) decrease in earnings of more than 20%: Integrated Oil & Gas (-50%), Oil & Gas Exploration & Production (-44%), and Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (-22%). On the other hand, two sub-industries have reported (year-over-year) earnings growth: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (29%) and Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation (5%). The Energy sector has also emerged as the largest detractor to overall earnings growth for the entire index. To get an idea of how badly the sector has pulled down everyone else, FactSet has reported that if this sector were excluded, the estimated (year-over-year) earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 would improve to 5.8% from 0.2%.

Things were not much better on the revenue side with the sector reporting the largest (year-over-year) revenue decline of all eleven sectors at -19.9%, again thanks to lower year-over-year oil prices. At the sub-industry level, four of the five sub-industries in the sector reported revenues declines of more than 10%: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production (-27%), Integrated Oil & Gas (-26%), Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (-14%), and Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation (-14%). On the other hand, the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (14%) sub-industry was the only sub-industry that reported revenue growth in the sector.

The Big 3 oilfield services (OFS) companies Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR), Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) have posted impressive top-and bottom-line growth, thanks to robust demand for their services as well as a surge in offshore oil and gas drilling.

Wall Street Remains Bullish

Luckily for the oil and gas bulls, Wall Street is not about to give up on the sector. FactSet has reported that overall, Wall Street has 11,062 ratings on stocks in the S&P 500, of which 54.4% are Buy ratings, 40.0% are Hold ratings, and 5.6% are Sell ratings. Interestingly, at the sector level, the Energy (64%) sector has the highest percentage of Buy ratings, while the Consumer Staples (45%) sector has the lowest percentage of Buy ratings.

It’s not hard to see why Wall Street remains largely bullish on energy, with most analysts expecting oil prices to remain high or go even higher.

“The energy stocks will obviously beat because of higher energy costs right now. The world cannot have a disruption in energy right now because the supply-demand imbalance in the world is very fragile,” Louis Navellier, chief investment officer at Navellier & Associates Inc., has said in a note.

As long as Saudi Arabia and OPEC+ maintain production discipline, oil bulls appear poised to win in the long run.

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com\»


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Why-Oil-Stocks-Are-Lagging-Behind-Soaring-Crude-Oil-Prices.html
« Última modificação: 2023-09-27 17:42:45 por Kaspov »
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!

I. I. Kaspov

  • Ordem dos Especialistas
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Mensagens: 5927
    • Ver Perfil
Re: Petróleo / Crude / Oil / Natural Gas - Tópico Principal
« Responder #1779 em: 2023-09-27 17:44:59 »
A loucura "verde" está a manifestar os seus efeitos...   ::)


«How The Transition Push Contributed To Higher Oil Prices

By Irina Slav - Sep 24, 2023, 6:00 PM CDT


    Anti-fossil fuel policies in the U.S. and Europe have led to lower investment in new projects.
    ExxonMobil CEO Woods: If we don't maintain some level of investment in the industry, you end up running short of supply.
    Only lowering global energy demand may lead to a situation in which prices will remain under control.

Join Our Community
Offshore rig

Earlier this week, Morgan Stanley said in a note that all signals for crude all were "flashing tightness".

The investment bank joined a growing number of forecasters expecting Brent crude to top $100 per barrel before the year's end, again.

What all these forecasters have in common is that all of them point out a discrepancy between demand for oil, which has remained strong, and supply, which has become increasingly constrained. At a time when governments in the West are making a huge effort to reduce that demand. And supply, too.

For now, they can only claim success in the supply area. And a major contribution to higher prices with that.

When President Biden came into office, his first order of business was to effectively ban oil and gas drilling on federal lands. He later revoked his ban as retail fuel prices began climbing and the White House reconsidered its attitude to local supply of hydrocarbons.

Not that it helped. Not when the whole energy policy of the administration has been oriented against the oil industry. We see the same situation in Europe, where the push against oil and gas is even stronger, and in other parts of the world, as well.

Reuters reported this week, citing Rystad Energy data, that investment in oil and gas on a global scale would only grow moderately this year to $579 billion. That compared to an average annual investment rate of $521 billion for the period between 2015 and 2022, after the 2014 peak, which stood at $887 billion.

Also this week, the Energy Information Administration reported that oil production from the U.S. shale patch was set to decline in October from September after the September average was also forecast to be lower than the average for August.

In fairness, the EIA has been proven too pessimistic in its forecast by the actual production data, with its forecast production decline for August actually turning out to be a modest monthly increase in production. Yet production did indeed decline this month, albeit still quite modestly. The bigger problem is it did not increase in any meaningful way, contributing to global tightness.
Related: Hedge Funds Are Sold On $100 Oil

Production is not increasing in any meaningful way elsewhere, either, even if we set aside for a moment the Saudi and Russian cut of a combined 1.3 million barrels daily. But demand is still strong, which has led to suggestions from transition campaigners that governments should switch targets and, instead of supply, focus on curbing demand by taxing the use of hydrocarbons.

This state of affairs does not bode well for the future energy security of a world that will consume close to 103 million barrels of crude oil every day this year, according to the latest to forecast peak oil demand, the International Energy Agency.

The chief executive of Aramco, who has been one of the most vocal critics of the transition push as it is being conducted, recently leveled a new dose of criticism at its planners: "The current transition shortcomings are already causing mass confusion across industries that produce and/or rely on energy. Long-term planners and investors do not know which way to turn," Nasser said at the World Petroleum Congress in Canada.

Exxon's CEO was more succinct: "If we don't maintain some level of investment in the industry, you end up running short of supply, which leads to high prices" – a scenario that is currently unfolding in Europe and the United States.

The reason there is no sufficient investment, according to the industry, is the uncertainty caused by the transition agenda of the governments where they operate. Indeed, when you have no clarity of the regulations that your government would direct your way as part of its efforts to fight climate change, investment decisions become even harder than usual to make.

As the executive chair of Canada'a Cenovus told Reuters, "If you want to add 100,000 barrels a day of production, you're going to spend billions and billions of dollars. In terms of any real meaningful investment in large projects, that's probably going to have to wait for some more clarity on the government front."

The situation is even worse for African countries that want to pursue their energy independence by developing their own hydrocarbon resources. Banks and international lenders such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund have made it quite clear they would not be lending for oil and gas development.

"We are being intimidated into running away from fossil fuel investment," the secretary general of the African Petroleum Producers' Organization, Omar Farouk Ibrahim, said as quoted by Reuters.

Yet Big Oil is still big enough to be able to put some money into new production without too much worry about the future. TotalEnergies recently said it could commit $9 billion to exploration in Suriname. Shell is drilling in Namibia and making discoveries that will require fresh investments to develop.

Whether these new exploration ventures would be enough to make up for lower production in legacy regions is hard to say. Perhaps, if governments really get down to curbing demand, balance could return to oil markets. For a short while. Because people really don't like to be told how little energy to use.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com»


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/How-The-Transition-Push-Contributed-To-Higher-Oil-Prices.html
Gloria in excelsis Deo; Jai guru dev; There's more than meets the eye; I don't know where but she sends me there; Let's Make Rome Great Again!