The greatest risk of war does not come from Trump’s policies, but the collapse of the EU thanks to mismanagement. I just provided a fairly detailed report on the Eastern Borders of Europe and the risks that exist there. The EU is inviting World War III because they REFUSE to admit that the refugees have created a huge problem that is tearing Europe apart. Remember what Caesar said? Divide & Conquer! The international media prefer to ignore that in many German regions local gyms have been confiscated and used as refugee shelters. Students have lost sports in many towns and this creates a number of difficulties and provokes social conflicts due to resentment.
Estes ressentimentos vão começar-se a sentir em muitos países.
De facto os "SR.ºs" europeus, não conseguem ver mais longe!
Foi agora a UK, a seguir France a depois os restantes...
Infelizmente a UE tem os dias contados.
As eleições que se avizinham vão ditar o fim da UE.
Vale a pena ler o restante:
The EU intend to be it a mistake that the British will regret and fall to their knees. This attitude is consistent with the constant endeavor to explain all the shortcomings of the EU as insignificant and irrelevant, thereby closing their ears and mind to any possible reform. The EU constantly repeated motto of a federalized Europe will less the risk of war but nobody else takes this seriously outside of Brussels. The “European Project” is creating the resentment that fuels war. With this policy in place, the Community has refused to listen to anyone but themselves. This has led to small issues festering and creating resentment which grows into a huge problem and Brexit that has spun Frexit and all the rest.
The EU refuse to even listen to the British and chose to ignore the speeches of the British Prime Minister, Theresa May. The PM May has announced a clear separation and rejected all interim solutions by the EU, which ultimately would still lead to a dependency upon Brussels. Britain demands that each nation must decide for itself who can immigrate. Just because Merkel allowed the refugees in to help her polls should not subjugate other nations to have to endure a vast influx of something they never voted for.
Britain is not willing to surrender all domestic law to that of the EU. Indeed, EU law is no longer to be applied in Britain. Here we have the EU demanding Ireland retroactively charge Apple taxes simply because their tax rate is less that the highest EU member. That is surrendering everything sovereign to Brussels. Laws are only to be decided by the British parliament – not Brussels. Jurisprudence is a matter for the British courts not the European Court.
De facto a May está determinada em não continuar, por outras formas, dependente da UE.
Mais é verdade que a lei na UK não igual, na maior parte dos casos, à UE.
Veja-se, por exemplo, a garantia de produtos eletrónicos. Apesar de eles poderem oferecer seguros até 3 anos... não seguem a lei geral.!
Etc.
A UE, infelizmente já era,
As the economy turns down and deflation prevails, the threat of foreign jobs is being addressed throughout Europe. Add to this the refugee crisis and you have a power keg throughout Europe waiting to go off. In view of the high unemployment in almost all countries, domestic citizens have ALWAYS turned against foreign workers as the easy scapegoats for the economic decline. This only merges with the high taxes reducing disposable income.
Uma comparação interessante: parecem sindicatos os que governam a UE!!!:
So while the EU thinks by punishing Britain they will discourage others from leaving, they are seriously mistaken. The dream of the EU is dead. It should have remained just a trade union – that was it.
E para piorar estes problemas, temos agora a questão da NATO e os países perto da Rússia.
Temos pólvora a juntar-se e só falta a faísca.
Infelizmente, são os governantes que temos.
O futuro, nos próximos anos está mesmo muito mau!
The problem with NATO has been that most members have not paid into the support of NATO that they had agreed to. The USA has been shouldering the majority of the cost of NATO, which would be like the EU funding US military. Then NATO leaders agreed back in 2016 to deploy military forces to the Baltic states and Eastern Poland for the first time and increase air and sea patrols to reassure new allies who use to be part of the Soviet bloc that they would defend them following Russia’s seizure of Crimea from Ukraine. This has merely increased the confrontations with Russia on the one hand but the Eastern countries themselves are not really aligned. The chaos inside the EU and the overreaching of NATO are the major factors inviting war. This also raises a most serious question: Exactly where does the power of NATO end and Russian power end? Effectively, where precisely is the border of influence?
All. Armstrong
