ah! as minhas sinceras desculpas...
está no léxico de um autor definidor do séc XX: Ayn Rand
Collectivism
Collectivism means the subjugation of the individual to a group—whether to a race, class or state does not matter. Collectivism holds that man must be chained to collective action and collective thought for the sake of what is called “the common good.”
“The Only Path to Tomorrow,”
Reader’s Digest, Jan, 1944, 8.
Collectivism holds that, in human affairs, the collective—society, the community, the nation, the proletariat, the race, etc.—is the unit of reality and the standard of value. On this view, the individual has reality only as part of the group, and value only insofar as he serves it.
The Ominous Parallels Leonard Peikoff,
The Ominous Parallels, 17
Collectivism holds that the individual has no rights, that his life and work belong to the group . . . and that the group may sacrifice him at its own whim to its own interests. The only way to implement a doctrine of that kind is by means of brute force—and statism has always been the political corollary of collectivism.
The Virtue of Selfishness “Racism,”
The Virtue of Selfishness, 128
Fascism and communism are not two opposites, but two rival gangs fighting over the same territory . . . both are variants of statism, based on the collectivist principle that man is the rightless slave of the state.
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal “‘Extremism,’ or the Art of Smearing,”
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 180
Modern collectivists . . . see society as a super-organism, as some supernatural entity apart from and superior to the sum of its individual members.
The Virtue of Selfishness “Collectivized ‘Rights,’”
The Virtue of Selfishness, 103
The philosophy of collectivism upholds the existence of a mystic (and unperceivable) social organism, while denying the reality of perceived individuals—a view which implies that man’s senses are not a valid instrument for perceiving reality. Collectivism maintains that an elite endowed with special mystic insight should rule men—which implies the existence of an elite source of knowledge, a fund of revelations inaccessible to logic and transcending the mind. Collectivism denies that men should deal with one another by voluntary means, settling their disputes by a process of rational persuasion; it declares that men should live under the reign of physical force (as wielded by the dictator of the omnipotent state)—a position which jettisons reason as the guide and arbiter of human relationships.
From every aspect, the theory of collectivism points to the same conclusion: collectivism and the advocacy of reason are philosophically antithetical; it is one or the other.
The Objectivist Leonard Peikoff, “Nazism vs. Reason,”
The Objectivist, Oct. 1969, 1
The political philosophy of collectivism is based on a view of man as a congenital incompetent, a helpless, mindless creature who must be fooled and ruled by a special elite with some unspecified claim to superior wisdom and a lust for power.
The Objectivist Newsletter “Who Will Protect Us from Our Protectors?”
The Objectivist Newsletter, May 1962, 17
What subjectivism is in the realm of ethics, collectivism is in the realm of politics. Just as the notion that “Anything I do is right because I chose to do it,” is not a moral principle, but a negation of morality—so the notion that “Anything society does is right because society chose to do it,” is not a moral principle, but a negation of moral principles and the banishment of morality from social issues.
The Virtue of Selfishness “Collectivized ‘Rights,’”
The Virtue of Selfishness, 101
As a cultural-intellectual power and a moral ideal, collectivism died in World War II. If we are still rolling in its direction, it is only by the inertia of a void and the momentum of disintegration. A social movement that began with the ponderous, brain-cracking, dialectical constructs of Hegel and Marx, and ends up with a horde of morally unwashed children stamping their foot and shrieking: “I want it now!”—is through.
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal “The Cashing-In: The Student ‘Rebellion,’”
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 266
Collectivism has lost the two crucial weapons that raised it to world power and made all of its victories possible: intellectuality and idealism, or reason and morality. It had to lose them precisely at the height of its success, since its claim to both was a fraud: the full, actual reality of socialist-communist-fascist states has demonstrated the brute irrationality of collectivist systems and the inhumanity of altruism as a moral code.
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal “The Cashing-In: The Student ‘Rebellion,’”
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 269
Collectivism does not preach sacrifice as a temporary means to some desirable end. Sacrifice is its end—sacrifice as a way of life. It is man’s independence, success, prosperity, and happiness that collectivists wish to destroy.
Observe the snarling, hysterical hatred with which they greet any suggestion that sacrifice is not necessary, that a non-sacrificial society is possible to men, that it is the only society able to achieve man’s well-being.
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal “Theory and Practice,”
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 137
The advocates of collectivism are motivated not by a desire for men’s happiness, but by hatred for man . . . hatred of the good for being the good; . . . the focus of that hatred, the target of its passionate fury, is the man of ability.
Philosophy: Who Needs It “An Untitled Letter,”
Philosophy: Who Needs It, 102
http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/collectivism.htmlpronto...
se está no léxico randiano é porque está bem... (not!)
mais alguém que valha a pena?
L
